Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Insensitivity of the Cloud Response to Surface Warming Under Radical Changes to Boundary Layer Turbulence and Cloud Microphysics: Results From the Ultraparameterized CAM
Ist Teil von
Journal of advances in modeling earth systems, 2018-12, Vol.10 (12), p.3139-3158
Ort / Verlag
Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2018
Quelle
Wiley Online Library Journals
Beschreibungen/Notizen
We study the cloud response to a +4K surface warming in a new multiscale climate model that uses enough interior resolution to begin explicitly resolving boundary layer turbulence (i.e., ultraparameterization or UP). UP's predictions are compared against those from standard superparameterization (SP). The mean cloud radiative effect feedback turns out to be remarkably neutral across all of our simulations, despite some radical changes in both cloud microphysical parameter settings and cloud‐resolving model grid resolution. The overall low cloud response to warming is a positive low cloud feedback over land, a negative feedback (driven by cloud optical depth increase) at high latitudes, and weak feedback over the low‐latitude oceans. The most distinct effects of UP result from tuning decisions impacting high‐latitude cloud feedback. UP's microphysics is tuned to optimize the model present‐day, top‐of‐atmosphere radiation fluxes against CERES observations, by lowering the cloud ice‐liquid phase shift temperature ramp, adjusting the ice/liquid autoconversion rate, and increasing the ice fall speed. This reduces high‐latitude low cloud amounts and damps the optical depth feedback at high latitudes, leading to a slightly more positive global cloud feedback compared to SP. A sensitivity test that isolates these microphysical impacts from UP's grid resolution confirms that the microphysical settings are mostly responsible for the differences between SP and UP cloud feedback.
Key Points
The cloud response to +4K warming is remarkably similar in UP (with explicit boundary layer) and standard SP
The microphysics is mostly responsible for the differences between SP and UP cloud feedback, and the CRM resolution has a secondary effect
The mean global cloud feedback is neutral across all of our simulations, despite some radical differences between the model configurations