Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Family Quarrels: Feminist Criticism, Queer Studies, and Shakespeare in the Twenty-First Century
Ist Teil von
Rethinking Feminism in Early Modern Studies, 2016, p.59-74
Ort / Verlag
Routledge
Erscheinungsjahr
2016
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Alma/SFX Local Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Since Madhavi Menon and Jonathan Goldberg published “Queering History” in 2005, a
debate about the usefulness of history in queer studies has been simmering. They advocate
abandoning what they see as the inevitably teleological project of history, on the grounds
that “we must never presume to know in advance how questions of sexuality will intersect
with or run aslant the prevailing forms of sociality marked by gender or status.”2 In their
view, queer studies must abandon the historical difference, first posited by Foucault in
The History of Sexuality, between homosociality, homoeroticism, and sodomy as acts in
the Renaissance, and homosexuality as a distinctively modern identity that dates from the
early nineteenth century. They see such historical alterity as based on the assumption of “a
determinate and knowable identity, past and present,” and it is this notion that they reject
because in their view, “paying attention to the question of sexuality as a question involves
violating the notion that history is the discourse of answers, a discourse whose commitment
to determinate signification . . . provides false closure.”3