Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Comparative Law and the Task of Negative Critique, 2023, p.11-63
Auflage
1
Ort / Verlag
Routledge
Erscheinungsjahr
2023
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Alma/SFX Local Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
This chapter challenges the historical narrative that orthodox comparatists-at-law have long been rehearsing about comparative law's institutional trajectory, a selective story that accords, not coincidentally, with the epistemic model they have been promoting. This chapter shows how a different account is possible, plausible, and warranted. Crucially, this other exposition informs a set of epistemic assumptions diametrically opposed to the orthodoxy's views as they have been governing within the field of comparative law.
This chapter challenges the historical narrative that orthodox comparatists-at-law have long been rehearsing about comparative law's institutional trajectory, a selective story that accords, not coincidentally, with the epistemic model they have been promoting. It shows how a different account is possible, plausible, and warranted. The growing awareness of the necessity of enhanced cultural autonomy and the sense that French history had to be re-written from a French perspective is readily ascertainable, for example, in the work of Jean Le Maire de Belges, 'the precursor of Gallic patriotism'. For Le Roy, it was difference that allowed the discovery of the internal logic governing human behaviour. The understanding of a mentalite was only possible following a series of comparisons, and the discourse on a people could only be conceived in the inscription of its difference vis-à-vis another type of social or political organization.