Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Burgwal, Aisa
• Gvianishvili, Natia
• Hård, Vierge
• Kata, Julia
• García Nieto, Isidro
• Orre, Cal
• Smiley, Adam
• Vidíc, Jelena
• Motmans, Joz
• Bouman, Walter Pierre
• Nieder, Timo O.

Titel

Health disparities between binary and non binary trans people: A community-driven survey

Ist Teil von

• Non-binary and Genderqueer Genders, 2020, p.100-111

Auflage

1

Ort / Verlag

Routledge

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background: Genderqueer and nonbinary () people have remained largely invisible in health research. Previous research shows worse outcomes on health indicators for trans people when compared with cisgender controls, but the differences between binary trans and GQNB individuals are inconclusive. Aims: To compare overall health and well-being of GQNB people with controls of trans men and trans women, taking into account the impact of the additive effect of their socio-economic position, as well as their current need for gender affirming medical interventions. Methods: A community-driven survey was conducted in 2016 in five countries (Georgia, Poland, Serbia, Spain, and Sweden). Self-reported health and general well-being were analysed for differences between binary trans and GQNB respondents. The effects of multiple control variables (age, economic situation, educational level, belonging to an ethnic, religious, sexual or ability minority group, sex assigned at birth) as well as the current need for gender affirming medical interventions were controlled for. Results: The sample consisted of 853 respondents aged 16 and older, with 254 trans women (29.8%), 369 trans men (43.2%), and 230 GQNB people (26%). GQNB respondents showed significantly worse self-reported health and worse general well-being in comparison to binary trans respondents. Additional negative impacts of having a lower educational level, having more economic stress, and belonging to a disability minority group were found. Being in need of gender affirming medical interventions contributed significantly to worse self-reported health, whereas being younger contributed to worse general well-being. Discussion: In understanding health disparities between binary trans and GQNB people, it is necessary to take into account the additive effect of multiple socio-economic positions, and the current need for gender affirming medical interventions. The high proportion of GQNB respondents who report worse health outcomes highlights the need for policy makers and health-care providers in creating nonbinary-inclusive environments. To compare overall health and well-being of Genderqueer and nonbinary (GQNB) people with controls of trans men and trans women, taking into account the impact of the additive effect of their socio-economic position, as well as their current need for gender affirming medical interventions. A community-driven survey was conducted in 2016 in five countries (Georgia, Poland, Serbia, Spain, and Sweden). This chapter aims to contribute to the quantitative research of self-reported health of GQNB people by analyzing indicators of overall health and well-being in GQNB people, with controls of binary trans people (trans men and trans women). It depicts an initial scoping of the health of GQNB trans people when compared with trans men and trans women, taking into account the impact of several socio-economic positions, as well as their current need for gender affirming medical interventions. In conclusion, the findings provide an initial mapping of health indicators of GQNB and binary identified trans individuals from five European countries.