Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Kalifi, Maroin
• Deguelte, Sophie
• Faron, Matthieu
• Afchain, Pauline
• de Mestier, Louis
• Lecomte, Thierry
• Pasquer, Arnaud
• Subtil, Fabien
• Alghamdi, Khalid
• Poncet, Gilles
• Walter, Thomas

Titel

The Need for Centralization for Small Intestinal Neuroendocrine Tumor Surgery: A Cohort Study from the GTE-Endocan-RENATEN Network, the CentralChirSINET Study

Ist Teil von

• Annals of surgical oncology, 2023-12, Vol.30 (13), p.8528-8541

Ort / Verlag

Cham: Springer International Publishing

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Quelle

SpringerNature Journals

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Background The concept of surgical centralization is becoming more and more accepted for specific surgical procedures. Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between procedure volume and the outcomes of surgical small intestine (SI) neuroendocrine tumor (NET) resections. Methods We conducted a retrospective national study that included patients who underwent SI-NET resection between 2019 and 2021. A high-volume center (hvC) was defined as a center that performed more than five SI-NET resections per year. The quality of the surgical resections was evaluated between hvCs and low-volume centers (lvCs) by comparing the number of resected lymph nodes (LNs) as the primary endpoint. Results A total of 157 patients underwent surgery in 33 centers: 90 patients in four hvCs and 67 patients in 29 lvCs. Laparotomy was more often performed in hvCs (85.6% vs. 59.7%; p  < 0.001), as was right hemicolectomy (64.4% vs. 38.8%; p  < 0.001), whereas limited ileocolic resection was performed in 18% of patients in lvCs versus none in hvCs. A bi-digital palpation of the entire SI length (95.6% vs. 34.3%, p  < 0.001), a cholecystectomy (93.3% vs. 14.9%; p  < 0.001), and a mesenteric mass resection (70% vs. 35.8%; p  < 0.001) were more often performed in hvCs. The proportion of patients with ≥8 LNs resected was significantly higher (96.3% vs. 65.1%; p  < 0.001) in hvCs compared with lvCs, as was the proportion of patients with ≥12 LNs resected (87.8% vs. 52.4%). Furthermore, the number of patients with multiple SI-NETs was higher in the hvC group compared with the lvC group (43.3% vs. 25.4%), as were the number of tumors in those patients (median of 7 vs. 2; p  < 0.001). Conclusions Optimal SI-NET resection was significantly more often performed in hvCs. Centralization of surgical care of SI-NETs is recommended.