Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 9 von 159

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Canopy leaf area of a mature evergreen Eucalyptus woodland does not respond to elevated atmospheric [CO2] but tracks water availability
Ist Teil von
  • Global change biology, 2016-04, Vol.22 (4), p.1666-1676
Ort / Verlag
England: Blackwell Science
Erscheinungsjahr
2016
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Canopy leaf area, quantified by the leaf area index (L), is a crucial driver of forest productivity, water use and energy balance. Because L responds to environmental drivers, it can represent an important feedback to climate change, but its responses to rising atmospheric [CO₂] and water availability of forests have been poorly quantified. We studied canopy leaf area dynamics for 28 months in a native evergreen Eucalyptus woodland exposed to free‐air CO₂ enrichment (the EucFACE experiment), in a subtropical climate where water limitation is common. We hypothesized that, because of expected stimulation of productivity and water‐use efficiency, L should increase with elevated [CO₂]. We estimated L from diffuse canopy transmittance, and measured monthly leaf litter production. Contrary to expectation, L did not respond to elevated [CO₂]. We found that L varied between 1.10 and 2.20 across the study period. The dynamics of L showed a quick increase after heavy rainfall and a steady decrease during periods of low rainfall. Leaf litter production was correlated to changes in L, both during periods of decreasing L (when no leaf growth occurred) and during periods of increasing L (active shedding of old foliage when new leaf growth occurred). Leaf lifespan, estimated from mean L and total annual litter production, was up to 2 months longer under elevated [CO₂] (1.18 vs. 1.01 years; P = 0.05). Our main finding that L was not responsive to elevated CO₂ is consistent with other forest FACE studies, but contrasts with the positive response of L commonly predicted by many ecosystem models.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX