Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 14 von 132

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Synchronized Pulsatile Flow With Low Systolic Output From Veno‐Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Improves Myocardial Recovery After Experimental Cardiac Arrest in Pigs
Ist Teil von
  • Artificial organs, 2018-06, Vol.42 (6), p.597-604
Ort / Verlag
United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2018
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Circulatory failure following cardiac arrest (CA) requires catecholamine support and occasionally veno‐arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vaECMO). VaECMO‐generated blood flow is continuous and retrograde, increasing ventricular stroke work. Our aim was to assess the benefit of a device generating a pulsatile vaECMO flow synchronized with the heart rhythm lowering systolic vaECMO output on the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and pulmonary capillary pressure (Pcap) after CA. This experimental randomized study in pigs compared standard nonpulsatile vaECMO (control) with pulsatile synchronized vaECMO (study) group using a pulsatility‐generating device. After sedation and intubation, ventricular fibrillation was induced by pacing. After 10‐min ventricular fibrillation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed for 20 min then vaECMO, defibrillation and 0.15 µg/kg/min intravenous epinephrine infusion were initiated. Hemodynamics, Pcap, LVEF by echocardiography and angiography were measured at baseline and every 30 min after the vaECMO start until vaECMO and epinephrine were stopped (at 120 min), and 30 min later. Baseline hemodynamics did not differ between groups; 120 min after vaECMO initiation, LVEF by echocardiography and angiography was significantly higher in the study than control group 55 ± 19% versus 34 ± 13% (P = 0.042), 50 ± 16% versus 33 ± 12% (P = 0.043), respectively. Pcap decreased from baseline by 4.2 ± 8.6 mm Hg in the study group but increased by 5.6 ± 5.9 mm Hg in the control group (P = 0.043). Thirty minutes later, LVEF remained higher in the study group 44 ± 7% versus 26 ± 11% (P = 0.008) while Pcap did not differ. A synchronized pulsatile device decreasing systolic output from vaECMO improved LVEF and Pcap in a pig model of CA and resuscitation.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX