Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 13 von 63

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Sirolimus Conversion Regimen Versus Continued Calcineurin Inhibitors in Liver Allograft Recipients: A Randomized Trial
Ist Teil von
  • American journal of transplantation, 2012-03, Vol.12 (3), p.694-705
Ort / Verlag
Malden, USA: Blackwell Publishing Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2012
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Electronic Journals Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • A large prospective, open‐label, randomized trial evaluated conversion from calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)‐ to sirolimus (SRL)‐based immunosuppression for preservation of renal function in liver transplantation patients. Eligible patients received liver allografts 6–144 months previously and maintenance immunosuppression with CNI (cyclosporine or tacrolimus) since early posttransplantation. In total, 607 patients were randomized (2:1) to abrupt conversion (<24 h) from CNI to SRL (n = 393) or CNI continuation for up to 6 years (n = 214). Between‐group changes in baseline‐adjusted mean Cockcroft–Gault GFR at month 12 (primary efficacy end point) were not significant. The primary safety end point, noninferiority of cumulative rate of graft loss or death at 12 months, was not met (6.6% vs. 5.6% in the SRL and CNI groups, respectively). Rates of death at 12 months were not significantly different, and no true graft losses (e.g. liver transplantation) were observed during the 12‐month period. At 52 weeks, SRL conversion was associated with higher rates of biopsy‐confirmed acute rejection (p = 0.02) and discontinuations (p < 0.001), primarily for adverse events. Adverse events were consistent with known safety profiles. In conclusion, liver transplantation patients showed no demonstrable benefit 1 year after conversion from CNI‐ to SRL‐based immunosuppression. Conversion from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus‐based immunosuppression for preservation of renal function in liver transplant recipients shows no demonstrable benefit at one year. See editorial by McKenna and Trotter on page 521.

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX