UNIVERSI
TÄ
TS-
BIBLIOTHEK
P
ADERBORN
Anmelden
Menü
Menü
Start
Hilfe
Blog
Weitere Dienste
Neuerwerbungslisten
Fachsystematik Bücher
Erwerbungsvorschlag
Bestellung aus dem Magazin
Fernleihe
Einstellungen
Sprache
Deutsch
Deutsch
Englisch
Farbschema
Hell
Dunkel
Automatisch
Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist
gegebenenfalls
nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich.
mehr Informationen...
Universitätsbibliothek
Katalog
Suche
Details
Zur Ergebnisliste
Ergebnis 22 von 142
Datensatz exportieren als...
BibTeX
A systematic review and synthesis of outcome domains for use within forensic services for people with intellectual disabilities
BJPsych open, 2017-01, Vol.3 (1), p.41-56
Morrissey, Catrin
Langdon, Peter E.
Geach, Nicole
Chester, Verity
Ferriter, Michael
Lindsay, William R.
McCarthy, Jane
Devapriam, John
Walker, Dawn-Marie
Duggan, Conor
Alexander, Regi
2017
Details
Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Morrissey, Catrin
Langdon, Peter E.
Geach, Nicole
Chester, Verity
Ferriter, Michael
Lindsay, William R.
McCarthy, Jane
Devapriam, John
Walker, Dawn-Marie
Duggan, Conor
Alexander, Regi
Titel
A systematic review and synthesis of outcome domains for use within forensic services for people with intellectual disabilities
Ist Teil von
BJPsych open, 2017-01, Vol.3 (1), p.41-56
Ort / Verlag
Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
There is limited empirical information on service-level outcome domains and indicators for the large number of people with intellectual disabilities being treated in forensic psychiatric hospitals. This study identified and developed the domains that should be used to measure treatment outcomes for this population. A systematic review of the literature highlighted 60 studies which met eligibility criteria; they were synthesised using content analysis. The findings were refined within a consultation and consensus exercises with carers, patients and experts. The final framework encompassed three superordinate domains: (a) effectiveness, (b) patient safety and (c) patient and carer experience. Within each of these, further sub-domains emerged from our systematic review and consultation exercises. These included severity of clinical symptoms, offending behaviours, reactive and restrictive interventions, quality of life and patient satisfaction. To index recovery, services need to measure treatment outcomes using this framework. None. © The Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 2056-4724
eISSN: 2056-4724
DOI: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.003616
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_fd5d99c0566b4b349926b9fd412e75f4
Format
–
Schlagworte
Clinical outcomes
,
Intellectual disabilities
,
Patient satisfaction
,
Review
,
Systematic review
Weiterführende Literatur
Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von
bX