Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 1 von 169

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Erratum to: Application of transiliac approach to intervertebral endoscopic discectomy in L5/S1 intervertebral disc herniation
Ist Teil von
  • European journal of medical research, 2017-07, Vol.22 (1), p.22-22, Article 22
Ort / Verlag
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
SpringerLink
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Following the publication of the original article [1], the corresponding author stated that he would like to make the following changes: 1. 1. In the abstract, in the first sentence of “Methods” section, “20 patients were diagnosed as non-L5/S1 disc herniation and underwent conventional approach (group R)”, the word “non” is deleted, and thus non-L5/S1 was replaced by L5/S1. Hence the final sentence was “20 patients were diagnosed as L5/S1 disc herniation and underwent conventional approach (group R)”. 2. 2. In the abstract, in the last sentence of “Results” section, “The MacNab score of the last follow-up showed excellent rate (95%) and good rate (90%) in groups I and R, respectively”, we feel the language of this sentence is not accurate and that “The MacNab score of the last follow-up showed excellent and good rate of 94.7% (18/19) and 90% (18/20) in group I and group R, respectively” could be better. 3. 3. In “Materials and methods”, in the second sentence under “Subjects” section, “Twenty patients (12 males and 8 females) with non-L5/S1 disc herniation”, the word “non” is deleted, and thus non-L5/S1 was replaced by L5/S1. Hence the final sentence was “Twenty patients (12 males and 8 females) with L5/S1 disc herniation”. 4. 4. In “Materials and methods”, in the second paragraph of "Inclusion criteria" which is under "Diagnostic criteria" section, the first sentence, “Group R: (1) Single segment without non-L5-S1 segment disc herniation in high iliac crest”, the phrase “without non-L5/S1” has been changed into “with L5/S1”. Hence the final sentence was “Group R: (1) Single segment with L5-S1 segment disc herniation in high iliac crest”. 5. 5. In “Discussion”, in the last sentence of the first paragraph, “The success rate of recurrent patient was about 85%, and below 3% in early period”, we feel the language of this sentence is not accurate and that “The success rate of recurrent patient was about 85%, and recurrence rate in early was below 3%” could be better.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 2047-783X, 0949-2321
eISSN: 2047-783X
DOI: 10.1186/s40001-017-0263-z
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_f6624f39e98942ffb2a8b0c6d4f8f4da
Format
Schlagworte
Back, Erratum, Patients

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX