Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 3 von 35
SA journal of radiology, 2023, Vol.27 (1), p.2587-2587
2023
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Comparison between ultrasound and chest X-ray to confirm central venous catheter tip position
Ist Teil von
  • SA journal of radiology, 2023, Vol.27 (1), p.2587-2587
Ort / Verlag
South Africa: AOSIS
Erscheinungsjahr
2023
Quelle
EZB Electronic Journals Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Background Mechanical central venous catheter (CVC) placement complications are mostly malposition or iatrogenic pneumothorax. Verification of catheter position by chest X-ray (CXR) is usually performed postoperatively.Objectives This prospective observational study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of peri-operative ultrasound and a ‘bubble test’ to detect malposition and pneumothorax.Method Sixty-one patients undergoing peri-operative CVC placement were included. An ultrasound protocol was used to directly visualise the CVC, perform the ‘bubble test’ and assess for the presence of pneumothorax. The time from agitated saline injection to visualisation of microbubbles in the right atrium was evaluated to determine the correct position of the CVC. The time required to perform the ultrasound assessment was compared to that of conducting the CXR.Results Chest X-ray identified 12 (19.7%) malpositions while ultrasound identified 8 (13.1%). Ultrasound showed a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.72 to 0.93) and a specificity of 0.5 (95% CI: 0.16 to 0.84). The positive and negative predictive values were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.80 to 0.98) and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.10 to 0.65), respectively. No pneumothorax was identified on ultrasound and CXR. The median time for ultrasound assessment was significantly shorter at 4 min (interquartile range [IQR]: 3–6 min), compared to performing a CXR that required a median time of 29 min (IQR: 18–56 min) (p<0.0001).Conclusion This study showed that ultrasound produced a high sensitivity and moderate specificity in detecting CVC malposition.Contribution Ultrasound can improve efficiency when used as a rapid bedside screening test to detect CVC malposition.
Sprache
Englisch; Portugiesisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1027-202X, 2078-6778
eISSN: 2078-6778
DOI: 10.4102/sajr.v27i1.2587
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_ee2847eb85e84315a5395daf977fba8c

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX