Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
A systematic review with evidence mapping of supportive care interventions for melanoma patients and caregivers
Ist Teil von
Cancer medicine (Malden, MA), 2023-06, Vol.12 (12), p.13758-13773
Ort / Verlag
United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2023
Quelle
Wiley Online Library Journals
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Aim
We conducted a systematic review and evidence gap mapping to explore the existing supportive care interventions and their impact on well‐being outcomes for melanoma patients and caregivers.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Index Medicus, CINAHL, Lilacs, CENTRAL (Cochrane Library) and PsycINFO in December 2022, including interventional studies assessing the effectiveness of any supportive care intervention among melanoma patients and/or their caregivers.
Findings
Twenty studies were included in this review. These studies consisted of randomised controlled trials (n = 11, 55%), pre‐post studies (n = 7, 35%) and quasi‐experimental trials (n = 2, 10%). All studies originated from high‐income countries and focused primarily on melanoma patients, with no studies identified that focused solely on caregivers. Educational interventions were the most common (n = 7, 35%), followed by psychoeducational interventions (n = 6, 30%) and psychotherapeutic interventions (n = 4, 20%). Nearly all included studies (n = 18, 90%) reported a positive effect of the intervention on the primary outcome of interest; however, most studies (n = 17, 85%) were judged to be at moderate or high risk of bias. Due to heterogeneity of study designs, intervention characteristics and outcome measures, meta‐analysis was not conducted.
Implications
Supportive care interventions have positive impacts on melanoma patient well‐being outcomes, while being acceptable and feasible to conduct. More research is needed regarding supportive care interventions for melanoma caregivers. Future research should focus on eliminating sources of bias through rigorous methodology, with the development of standardised outcome measures for psychosocial outcomes to facilitate future meta‐analyses.
With increasing global incidence and survival rates, the number of people living with a previous diagnosis of melanoma is expected to grow in coming years. People diagnosed with melanoma, as well as their caregivers, often report decreased quality of life and daily functioning as a result of diagnosis and the adverse effects of treatment. We performed a systematic review with evidence gap mapping to synthesize the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of supportive care interventions for melanoma patients and their caregivers.