Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Acciuffi, Sara
• Hilal, Mohammed Abu
• Ferrari, Clarissa
• Al-Madhi, Sara
• Chouillard, Marc-Anthony
• Messaoudi, Nouredin
• Croner, Roland S
• Gumbs, Andrew A

Titel

Study International Multicentric Pancreatic Left Resections (SIMPLR): Does Surgical Approach Matter?

Ist Teil von

• Cancers, 2024-03, Vol.16 (5), p.1051

Ort / Verlag

Switzerland: MDPI AG

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

EZB Electronic Journals Library

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Minimally invasive surgery is increasingly preferred for left-sided pancreatic resections. The SIMPLR study aims to compare open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches using propensity score matching analysis. This study included 258 patients with tumors of the left side of the pancreas who underwent surgery between 2016 and 2020 at three high-volume centers. The patients were divided into three groups based on their surgical approach and matched in a 1:1 ratio. The open group had significantly higher estimated blood loss (620 mL vs. 320 mL, < 0.001), longer operative time (273 vs. 216 min, = 0.003), and longer hospital stays (16.9 vs. 6.81 days, < 0.001) compared to the laparoscopic group. There was no difference in lymph node yield or resection status. When comparing open and robotic groups, the robotic procedures yielded a higher number of lymph nodes (24.9 vs. 15.2, = 0.011) without being significantly longer. The laparoscopic group had a shorter operative time (210 vs. 340 min, < 0.001), shorter ICU stays (0.63 vs. 1.64 days, < 0.001), and shorter hospital stays (6.61 vs. 11.8 days, < 0.001) when compared to the robotic group. There was no difference in morbidity or mortality between the three techniques. The laparoscopic approach exhibits short-term benefits. The three techniques are equivalent in terms of oncological safety, morbidity, and mortality.