Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Gumber, M
• Jain, S
• Kute, V
• Shah, P
• Patel, H
• Vanikar, A
• Modi, P
• Trivedi, H

Titel

Outcome of second kidney transplant: A single center experience

Ist Teil von

• Saudi journal of kidney diseases and transplantation, 2013-07, Vol.24 (4), p.696-701

Ort / Verlag

Saudi Arabia: Saudi Center for Organ Transplantation

Erscheinungsjahr

2013

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Nowadays, a repeat transplantation is considered to confer a better survival advantage to patients over dialysis. The cost-effectiveness of transplantation for end-stage renal disease patients shows benefits over dialysis even for re-transplanted patients. This retrospective single center ten-year study was undertaken to evaluate patient/graft survival, function vis-à-vis serum creatinine (SCr) and rejection episodes in 62 re-transplanted patients. Sixty-two patients underwent a second renal transplant (24 living related, 38 deceased donors) at our center between 2000 to 2009. The mean recipient age was 41.9 ± 12.27 years. Fifty-three recipients were male and nine recipients were female. Recipients had negative acceptable lymphocyte cross-matching using anti-human globulin complement-dependent cytotoxicity tests and flow cytometric cross-match before transplant. All recipients except those who were hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B surface antigen positive received single-dose rabbit-anti-thymocyte globulin induction and steroids, calcineurin inhibitor ± mycophenolate mofetil/azathioprine for maintenance immunosuppression. Of the 62 patients, 38 patients received kidneys from deceased donors and 24 patients received kidneys from live donors. Over the mean follow-up of 4.03 ± 2.93 years, the 1-year, 5-year and 10-year patient survival rates were 85.33%, 66.7% and 66.7%, respectively, and the graft survival rates were 96.7%, 79.7% and 79.7%, respectively. The acute rejection rates were 17.6%, with a mean SCr of 1.92 ± 0.5 mg/dL. There was unexplained interstitial fibrosis with tubular atrophy in 11.2% patients (n = 7), all leading to graft loss eventually. Overall, 25% (n = 16) of the patients were lost, mainly to infectious complications. Re-transplantation has acceptable graft and patient survival over a ten-year follow-up period and should be encouraged for better quality of life as compared with dialysis.