Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 2 von 245
Journal for peace and nuclear disarmament, 2022-06, Vol.5 (sup1), p.6-23
2022
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Counterforce Dilemmas and the Risk of Nuclear War in East Asia
Ist Teil von
  • Journal for peace and nuclear disarmament, 2022-06, Vol.5 (sup1), p.6-23
Ort / Verlag
Routledge
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Quelle
EZB Electronic Journals Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • The discovery of new Chinese nuclear missile silos, a seemingly escalating nuclear-conventional arms competition between the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) and the Republic of Korea (ROK), and the announcement that Australia, in concert with the United States and the United Kingdom, is pursuing nuclear-powered attack submarines are events that collectively indicate a worsening security environment in East Asia. Using geostrategic, operational, and technological factors as the basis for analysis, this paper contextualizes these and other developments and assesses the potential for nuclear war in East Asia in general and on the Korean Peninsula in particular. The most dangerous threat to strategic stability is a counterforce dilemma where the conventional weapons of the United States, China, and regional East Asian actors may create strategic instability by their intentional or inadvertent entanglement or use to target the nuclear forces of another state, resulting in pursuit of more secure second-strike capability by the countries of the region, and forming the heart of conventional warfighting and deterrence strategies. The many different conflictual or competitive relationships across the region make arms control initiatives unlikely to succeed, but the maritime nature of the geostrategic environment and the lack of existential threat that the United States and China pose to each other may offer fewer natural pathways to the use of nuclear weapons for either China or the United States than there were for the adversaries in the Cold War.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 2575-1654
eISSN: 2575-1654
DOI: 10.1080/25751654.2022.2064153
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_c1978233533042e5b704e7cdf6004d68

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX