Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Impact of Feed Delivery Pattern on Aerial Particulate Matter and Behavior of Feedlot Cattle
Ist Teil von
Animals (Basel), 2017-03, Vol.7 (3), p.14
Ort / Verlag
Switzerland: MDPI AG
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Quelle
EZB Electronic Journals Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Fine particulate matter with less than 2.5 microns diameter (PM
) generated by cattle in feedlots is an environmental pollutant and a potential human and animal health issue. The objective of this study was to determine if a feeding schedule affects cattle behaviors that promote PM
in a commercial feedlot. The study used 2813 crossbred steers housed in 14 adjacent pens at a large-scale commercial West Texas feedlot. Treatments were conventional feeding at 0700, 1000, and 1200 (CON) or feeding at 0700, 1000, and 1830 (ALT), the latter feeding time coincided with dusk. A mobile behavior lab was used to quantify behaviors of steers that were associated with generation of PM
(e.g., fighting, mounting of peers, and increased locomotion). PM
samplers measured respirable particles with a mass median diameter ≤2.5 μm (PM
) every 15 min over a period of 7 d in April and May. Simultaneously, the ambient temperature, humidity, wind speed and direction, precipitation, air pressure, and solar radiation were measured with a weather station. Elevated downwind PM
concentrations were measured at dusk, when cattle that were fed according to the ALT vs. the CON feeding schedule, demonstrated less PM
-generating behaviors (
< 0.05). At dusk, steers on ALT vs. CON feeding schedules ate or were waiting to eat (standing in second row behind feeding cattle) at much greater rates (
< 0.05). Upwind PM
concentrations were similar between the treatments. Downwind PM
concentrations averaged over 24 h were lower from ALT compared with CON pens (0.072 vs. 0.115 mg/m³,
< 0.01). However, dry matter intake (DMI) was less (
< 0.05), and average daily gain (ADG) tended to be less (
< 0.1) in cattle that were fed according to the ALT vs. the CON feeding schedules, whereas feed efficiency (aka gain to feed, G:F) was not affected. Although ALT feeding may pose a challenge in feed delivery and labor scheduling, cattle exhibited fewer PM
-generating behaviors and reduced generation of PM
when feed delivery times matched the natural desires of cattle to eat in a crepuscular pattern.