Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 7 von 434
International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation, 2020-08, Vol.90, p.102112, Article 102112
2020
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Estimating fractional vegetation cover from leaf area index and clumping index based on the gap probability theory
Ist Teil von
  • International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation, 2020-08, Vol.90, p.102112, Article 102112
Ort / Verlag
Elsevier B.V
Erscheinungsjahr
2020
Quelle
Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • •The gap probability theorymethodimprovesthe accuracy of FVC estimates.•FVCgapestimates provide themore reasonable spatial and temporaldistributions.•The use of CI productsignificantly reducesthe FVC differencefor dense canopy. Gap probability theory provides a theoretical equation to calculate fractional vegetation cover (FVC). However, the main algorithms used in present FVC products generation are still the linear mixture model and machine learning methods. The reason to limit the gap probability theory applied in the product algorithm is the availability and accuracy of leaf area index (LAI) and clumping index (CI) products. With the improvement of the LAI and CI products, it is necessary to assess whether the algorithm based on gap probability theory using the present products can improve the accuracy of FVC products. In this study, we generated the FVC estimates based on the gap probability theory (FVCgap) with a resolution of 500 m every 8 days for Europe. FVCgap estimates were validated with field FVC measurements of ImagineS from 2013 to 2015 for crop types. Two existing FVC products, Geoland2 Version1 (GEOV1) and Multisource data Synergized Quantitative remote sensing production system (MuSyQ), were used to inter-compare with the FVCgap estimates. FVCgap estimates showed a better agreement with field FVC measurements, with lowest root mean square error (RMSE) (0.1211) and bias (0.0224), than GEOV1 and MuSyQ FVC products. The inter-annual and seasonal variations of FVCgap estimates were also showed the most consistent with field measurements.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1569-8432
eISSN: 1872-826X
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2020.102112
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b7615e4e420f4826af5d9b394a130931
Format
Schlagworte
FVC, GEOV1, LAI, MuSyQ

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX