Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 1 von 1258
Environmental research letters, 2014-11, Vol.9 (11), p.115004
2014

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Feed and manure use in low-N-input and high-N-input dairy cattle production systems
Ist Teil von
  • Environmental research letters, 2014-11, Vol.9 (11), p.115004
Ort / Verlag
Bristol: IOP Publishing
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
EZB Electronic Journals Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • In most parts of Sub-Saharan Africa fertilizers and feeds are costly, not readily available and used sparingly in agricultural production. In many parts of Western Europe, North America, and Oceania fertilizers and feeds are relatively inexpensive, readily available and used abundantly to maximize profitable agricultural production. A case study, dairy systems approach was used to illustrate how differences in feed and manure management in a low-N-input dairy cattle system (Niger, West Africa) and a high-N-input dairy production system (Wisconsin, USA) impact agricultural production and environmental N loss. In Niger, an additional daily feed N intake of 114 g per dairy animal unit (AU, 1000 kg live weight) could increase annual milk production from 560 to 1320 kg AU−1, and the additional manure N could greatly increase millet production. In Wisconsin, reductions in daily feed N intake of 100 g AU−1 would not greatly impact milk production but decrease urinary N excretion by 25% and ammonia and nitrous oxide emissions from manure by 18% to 30%. In Niger, compared to the practice of housing livestock and applying dung only onto fields, corralling cattle or sheep on cropland (to capture urinary N) increased millet yields by 25% to 95%. The additional millet grain due to dung applications or corralling would satisfy the annual food grain requirements of 2-5 persons; the additional forage would provide 120-300 more days of feed for a typical head of cattle; and 850 to 1600 kg ha−1 more biomass would be available for soil conservation. In Wisconsin, compared to application of barn manure only, corralling heifers in fields increased forage production by only 8% to 11%. The application of barn manure or corralling increased forage production by 20% to 70%. This additional forage would provide 350-580 more days of feed for a typical dairy heifer. Study results demonstrate how different approaches to feed and manure management in low-N-input and high-N-input dairy cattle systems impact milk production, manure N excretion, manure N capture, N recycling and environmental N loss.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1748-9326
eISSN: 1748-9326
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/11/115004
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_b50c4fcf4e8b49bcbc4005b4901aec9e

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX