Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Zapata, Giancarlo Saal
• Saal‐Zapata, Giancarlo
• Valer‐Gonzales, Dante
• Preguntegui‐Loayza, Ivethe
• Rodriguez‐Calienes, Aaron
• Rodriguez‐Varela, Rodolfo

Titel

Abstract 1122‐000060: Endovascular Treatment of Large Intracranial Aneurysms Using Large Volume Coils: Safety and Efficacy

Ist Teil von

• Stroke: vascular and interventional neurology, 2021-11, Vol.1 (S1)

Ort / Verlag

Phoenix: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2021

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract only Introduction : Large volume coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms have demonstrated better packing density, shorter operative times, less number of coils per aneurysm and better cost‐effectiveness. However, most of the studies evaluated these coils in small or medium sized aneurysms. Therefore, our study aimed to determine our experience using large volume coils in the treatment of large intracranial aneurysms and determine its safety and efficacy. Methods : We retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases of intracranial aneurysms treated with Penumbra Coils 400 (PC400) at our institution between May 2016 and September 2019. Aneurysms > 12 mm in maximal diameter were selected according to the ISUIA trial. Clinical and radiological variables were collected. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) was used to determine the clinical outcome and was dichotomized (good clinical outcome: mRS £2; poor clinical outcome: mRS >2). The Raymond Roy occlusion classification (RROC) was used to determine obliterations rates. An adequate obliteration was defined as RROC 1 or 2. Categorical variables were expressed as percentages and continuous variables as mean ± standard deviation. Stata v14 software was used for the analysis. Results : Eighteen patients harboring 18 intracranial aneurysms were treated. The mean age was 55 ± 12 years and 14 patients (78%) were women. A good preoperative clinical condition was found in 13 patients (72%). Ten aneurysms were unruptured (56%) and eight were dysplastic (44%). Paraclinoid aneurysms were the most frequently treated (61%). The mean number of coils were 6.2/aneurysm. The mean maximal diameter and neck were 18.9 ± 4.3 mm, and 5.7 ± 2.6 mm, respectively. The mean aspect ratio (AR) was 4 ± 1.9. Coiling was used in 10 cases (56%) followed by stent‐assisted coiling in 7 cases (39%) and balloon‐assisted coiling in 1 case. An immediate adequate obliteration rate was found in 8 cases (44%). Intraoperative complications occurred in two patients in which a coil loop migrated to the parent artery and a stent was placed without clinical consequences. In twelve patients (67%), angiographic follow‐up was performed. The mean follow‐up duration was 9.7 months. Nine patients (75%) showed a complete obliteration (RROC 1), whereas in three patients a residual aneurysm was still present. A good postoperative clinical outcome at discharge was found in 14 patients (78%). Procedure‐related morbidity and mortality were not reported. Conclusions : Embolization with large volume coils is a safe and effective alternative to conventional coils, with high obliteration rates at mid‐term follow‐up. Longer duration of angiographic follow‐up are needed in order to confirm the results presented here.