Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Harada, Taku
• Watari, Takashi
• Watanuki, Satoshi
• Hiroshige, Juichi
• Kushiro, Seiko
• Miyagami, Taiju
• Syusa, Syunsuke
• Suzuki, Satoshi
• Hiyoshi, Tetsuya
• Hasegawa, Suguru
• Nabeshima, Shigeki
• Aihara, Hidetoshi
• Yamashita, Shun
• Tago, Masaki
• Yoshimura, Fumitaka
• Kunitomo, Kotaro
• Tsuji, Takahiro
• Hirose, Masanori
• Tsuchida, Tomoya
• Shimizu, Taro

Titel

Diagnostic error rates and associated factors for lower gastrointestinal perforation

Ist Teil von

• Scientific reports, 2022-01, Vol.12 (1), p.1028-1028, Article 1028

Ort / Verlag

England: Nature Publishing Group

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Lower gastrointestinal perforation is rare and challenging to diagnose in patients presenting with an acute abdomen. However, no study has examined the frequency and associated factors of diagnostic errors related to lower gastrointestinal perforation. This large-scale multicenter retrospective study investigated the frequency of diagnostic errors and identified the associated factors. Factors at the level of the patient, symptoms, situation, and physician were included in the analysis. Data were collected from nine institutions, between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2019. Timely diagnosis was defined as diagnosis at the first visit in computed tomography (CT)-capable facilities or referral to an appropriate medical institution immediately following the first visit to a non-CT-capable facility. Cases not meeting this definition were defined as diagnostic errors that resulted in delayed diagnosis. Of the 439 cases of lower gastrointestinal perforation identified, delayed diagnosis occurred in 138 cases (31.4%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed a significant association between examination by a non-generalist and delayed diagnosis. Other factors showing a tendency with delayed diagnosis included presence of fever, absence of abdominal tenderness, and unavailability of urgent radiology reports. Initial misdiagnoses were mainly gastroenteritis, constipation, and small bowel obstruction. In conclusion, diagnostic errors occurred in about one-third of patients with a lower gastrointestinal perforation.