Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 5 von 459

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Comparative effectiveness and resource utilization of nab -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine for the first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a US community setting
Ist Teil von
  • Cancer management and research, 2017-01, Vol.9, p.141-148
Ort / Verlag
New Zealand: Taylor & Francis Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Quelle
EZB Electronic Journals Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Despite a clinically relevant, statistically significant survival benefit with -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine and FOLFIRINOX vs single-agent gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC), little is known regarding their real-world effectiveness. We analyzed patients with mPC using a nationally representative electronic medical records database to address this unmet need. This retrospective analysis of the Navigating Cancer database compared outcomes among patients who received first-line -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, FOLFIRINOX, or gemcitabine for mPC. Effectiveness, safety, and supportive care use were examined. -Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine was the reference for statistical comparisons. Baseline characteristics were similar except age (oldest patients were in the gemcitabine cohort followed by -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine, then FOLFIRINOX). Patients receiving -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (n=122) demonstrated similar time to treatment discontinuation (TTD; median, 3.4 vs 3.8 months; =0.947) and database persistence (DP; median, 8.6 vs 8.6 months; =0.534) vs FOLFIRINOX (n=80); however, TTD (median, 3.4 vs 2.2 months; <0.001) and DP (median, 8.6 vs 5.3 months; =0.030) were significantly longer with -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine vs gemcitabine (n=46). There were more any-grade adverse events with FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine vs -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (95% or 89% vs 84%, respectively). This real-world analysis confirms the phase III MPACT trial findings and demonstrates that -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine has effectiveness similar to that of FOLFIRINOX but greater tolerability for treating mPC despite younger patients being in the FOLFIRINOX cohort. These findings support -paclitaxel plus gemcitabine as an appropriate first-line treatment option for patients with mPC.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1179-1322
eISSN: 1179-1322
DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S126073
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_86965f172423499db78fa51ca523c31d

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX