Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Tashjian, Sarah M
• Wise, Toby
• Mobbs, Dean
• Cai, Ming Bo

Titel

Model-based prioritization for acquiring protection

Ist Teil von

• PLoS computational biology, 2022-12, Vol.18 (12), p.e1010805-e1010805

Ort / Verlag

United States: Public Library of Science

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Protection often involves the capacity to prospectively plan the actions needed to mitigate harm. The computational architecture of decisions involving protection remains unclear, as well as whether these decisions differ from other beneficial prospective actions such as reward acquisition. Here we compare protection acquisition to reward acquisition and punishment avoidance to examine overlapping and distinct features across the three action types. Protection acquisition is positively valenced similar to reward. For both protection and reward, the more the actor gains, the more benefit. However, reward and protection occur in different contexts, with protection existing in aversive contexts. Punishment avoidance also occurs in aversive contexts, but differs from protection because punishment is negatively valenced and motivates avoidance. Across three independent studies (Total N = 600) we applied computational modeling to examine model-based reinforcement learning for protection, reward, and punishment in humans. Decisions motivated by acquiring protection evoked a higher degree of model-based control than acquiring reward or avoiding punishment, with no significant differences in learning rate. The context-valence asymmetry characteristic of protection increased deployment of flexible decision strategies, suggesting model-based control depends on the context in which outcomes are encountered as well as the valence of the outcome.