Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Acharya-Patel, Neha
• Groenwold, Emma
• Lemay, Matthew A.
• Clemente-Carvalho, Rute
• Morien, Evan
• Dudas, Sarah
• Rubidge, Emily
• Yang, Cecilia Lingyu
• Coombe, Lauren
• Warren, René L.
• Frid, Alejandro
• Birol, Inanc
• Helbing, Caren C.

Titel

Comparison of environmental DNA and SCUBA diving methods to survey keystone rockfish species on the Central Coast of British Columbia, Canada

Ist Teil von

• Ecological indicators, 2024-03, Vol.160, p.111830, Article 111830

Ort / Verlag

Elsevier Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

EZB Electronic Journals Library

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• [Display omitted] •Rockfish are culturally and economically important requiring marine protection.•Many rockfish species overlap geographically making environmental DNA surveys hard.•qPCR-based eDNA assays were successfully designed for target rockfish species.•eDNA metabarcoding detected significantly more species than SCUBA diving surveys.•Combining eDNA and conventional methods strengthen rockfish biodiversity monitoring. The rocky reefs of British Columbia’s (BC) coast are a productive ecosystem, home to 38 rockfish species (Genus: Sebastes) that are culturally and economically important. Quantitatively assessing rockfish populations is vital to support conservation and stock assessment needs. Self-contained underwater breathing apparatus (SCUBA) diving surveys are a commonly used monitoring method in BC. However, this resource-intensive approach is challenging, particularly for cryptic or deeper species. Herein, we compared environmental DNA (eDNA) detection methods with SCUBA diving surveys to capture overall rockfish biodiversity. We employed two eDNA methods: 1) a targeted quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) approach to monitor species of particular importance to First Nations collaborators and decision makers, and 2) a metabarcoding approach for assessing community composition using the previously published MiSebastes assay. Both approaches are confounded by the little DNA sequence divergence among species and high sequence variation within species. Overcoming these challenges using a whole mitochondrial approach with the mtGrasp and unikseq pipelines, we generated highly useful eDNA tools. We found that eDNA methods were highly comparable to dive surveys, as both methods indicated a similar ecological reality, including species detections and distributions. Though there are certain species that cannot be distinguished by the MiSebastes assay, eDNA metabarcoding still detected more rockfish species overall. Both eDNA methods show potential for use alongside conventional methods for scalable incorporation into community-based monitoring programs.