Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 18 von 591
Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2016, Vol.8 (8), p.615-615
2016

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Rapid Assessments of Amazon Forest Structure and Biomass Using Small Unmanned Aerial Systems
Ist Teil von
  • Remote sensing (Basel, Switzerland), 2016, Vol.8 (8), p.615-615
Ort / Verlag
Basel: MDPI AG
Erscheinungsjahr
2016
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
EZB Electronic Journals Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) can provide new ways to measure forests and supplement expensive or labor-intensive inventory methods. Forest carbon, a key uncertainty in the global carbon cycle and also important for carbon conservation programs, is typically monitored using manned aircraft or extensive forest plot networks to estimate aboveground carbon density (ACD). Manned aircraft are only cost-effective when applied to large areas (>100,000 ha), while plot networks are most effective for total C stock estimation across large areas, not for quantifying spatially-explicit variation. We sought to develop an effective method for frequent and accurate ACD estimation at intermediate scales (100-100,000 ha) that would be sensitive to small-scale disturbance. Using small UAVs, we collected imagery of 516 ha of lowland forest in the Peruvian Amazon. We then used a structure-from-motion (SFM) approach to create a 3D model of forest canopy. Comparing SFM- and airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-derived estimates of canopy height and ACD, we found that SFM estimates of top-of-canopy height (TCH) and ACD were highly correlated with previous LiDAR estimates (r = 0.86-0.93 and r = 0.73-0.94 for TCH and ACD, respectively, at 0.1-4 ha grain sizes), with r = 0.92 for ACD determination at the 1 ha scale, despite SFM and LiDAR measurements being separated by two years in a dynamic forest. SFM and LiDAR estimates of mean TCH and mean ACD were highly similar, differing by only 0.4% and 0.04%, respectively, within mature forest. The technique allows inexpensive, near-real-time monitoring of ACD for ecological studies, payment for ecosystem services (PES) ventures, such as reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD+), forestry enterprises, and governance.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 2072-4292
eISSN: 2072-4292
DOI: 10.3390/rs8080615
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_81e37605e6b348de8845acaa793907c1

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX