Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 19 von 84
Religions (Basel, Switzerland ), 2022-10, Vol.13 (10), p.978
2022
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Preferences and Consensus in the Philosophy of Xunzi
Ist Teil von
  • Religions (Basel, Switzerland ), 2022-10, Vol.13 (10), p.978
Ort / Verlag
Basel: MDPI AG
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Quelle
EZB Electronic Journals Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • To understand Confucian ethics as a “hierarchical mode of association” is to think that it is incapable of dealing with a society of strangers or to understand Confucian ethics as “authoritarian” or “collectivist”, and to criticize that it ignores human characteristics and freedoms is to mistake one part of Confucianism for the whole. The Confucian theory of the individual and community actually has a tightly woven structure wherein its recognition of the plurality of diverse individuals and its appeal the unity of a common consensus are combined. From an exploration into the relationship between Xunzi’s concepts of “preference” (teyi 特意) and “consensus” (gongshi 共予) and from the way he uses such concepts as “similarity and difference” (tongyi 同異), “one and ten thousand” (yiwan 一萬), and “unity and division” (tongfen 統分), I show how Xunzi included the diversity of individuals within a pluralist society in a unified community with a collective consensus where this community at the same time guarantees the freedoms and preferences of each individual member that belongs to it.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 2077-1444
eISSN: 2077-1444
DOI: 10.3390/rel13100978
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_7b2549d487ab46118d7a0c74d9003e87

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX