Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Reuter, Marvin
• Rigó, Mariann
• Formazin, Maren
• Liebers, Falk
• Latza, Ute
• Castell, Stefanie
• Jöckel, Karl-Heinz
• Greiser, Karin Halina
• Michels, Karin B
• Krause, Gérard
• Albrecht, Stefan
• Öztürk, Ilter
• Kuss, Oliver
• Berger, Klaus
• Lampl, Benedikt M J
• Leitzmann, Michael
• Zeeb, Hajo
• Starke, Karla Romero
• Schipf, Sabine
• Meinke-Franze, Claudia
• Ahrens, Wolfgang
• Seidler, Andreas
• Klee, Bianca
• Pischon, Tobias
• Deckert, Andreas
• Schmidt, Börge
• Mikolajczyk, Rafael
• Karch, André
• Bohn, Barbara
• Brenner, Hermann
• Holleczek, Bernd
• Dragano, Nico

Titel

Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk among 108 960 workers during the first pandemic wave in Germany

Ist Teil von

• Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2022-09, Vol.48 (6), p.446-456

Ort / Verlag

Finland: Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• The aim of this study was to identify the occupational risk for a SARS-CoV-2 infection in a nationwide sample of German workers during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (1 February-31 August 2020). We used the data of 108 960 workers who participated in a COVID follow-up survey of the German National Cohort (NAKO). Occupational characteristics were derived from the German Classification of Occupations 2010 (Klassifikation der Berufe 2010). PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections were assessed from self-reports. Incidence rates (IR) and incidence rate ratios (IRR) were estimated using robust Poisson regression, adjusted for person-time at risk, age, sex, migration background, study center, working hours, and employment relationship. The IR was 3.7 infections per 1000 workers [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.3-4.1]. IR differed by occupational sector, with the highest rates observed in personal (IR 4.8, 95% CI 4.0-5.6) and business administration (IR 3.4, 95% CI 2.8-3.9) services and the lowest rates in occupations related to the production of goods (IR 2.0, 95% CI 1.5-2.6). Infections were more frequent among essential workers compared with workers in non-essential occupations (IRR 1.95, 95% CI 1.59-2.40) and among highly skilled compared with skilled professions (IRR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.72). The results emphasize higher infection risks in essential occupations and personal-related services, especially in the healthcare sector. Additionally, we found evidence that infections were more common in higher occupational status positions at the beginning of the pandemic.