Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Iaccarino, Corrado
• Chibbaro, Salvatore
• Sauvigny, Thomas
• Timofeev, Ivan
• Zaed, Ismail
• Franchetti, Silvio
• Mee, Harry
• Belli, Antonio
• Buki, Andras
• De Bonis, Pasquale
• Demetriades, Andreas K.
• Depreitere, Bart
• Fountas, Kostantinos
• Ganau, Mario
• Germanò, Antonino
• Hutchinson, Peter
• Kolias, Angelos
• Lindner, Dirk
• Lippa, Laura
• Marklund, Niklas
• McMahon, Catherine
• Mielke, Dorothee
• Nasi, Davide
• Peul, Wilco
• Poca, Maria Antonia
• Pompucci, Angelo
• Posti, Jussi P.
• Serban, Nicoleta-Larisa
• Splavski, Bruno
• Florian, Ioan Stefan
• Tasiou, Anastasia
• Zona, Gianluigi
• Servadei, Franco

Titel

Consensus-based recommendations for diagnosis and surgical management of cranioplasty and post-traumatic hydrocephalus from a European panel

Ist Teil von

• Brain & spine, 2024-01, Vol.4, p.102761-102761, Article 102761

Ort / Verlag

Netherlands: Elsevier B.V

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Quelle

EZB Electronic Journals Library

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Planning cranioplasty (CPL) in patients with suspected or proven post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) poses a significant management challenge due to a lack of clear guidance. This project aims to create a European document to improve adherence and adapt to local protocols based on available resources and national health systems. After a thorough non-systematic review, a steering committee (SC) formed a European expert panel (EP) for a two-round questionnaire using the Delphi method. The questionnaire employed a 9-point Likert scale to assess the appropriateness of statements inherent to two sections: "Diagnostic criteria for PTH" and "Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction." The panel reached a consensus on 29 statements. In the "Diagnostic criteria for PTH" section, five statements were deemed "appropriate" (consensus 74.2−90.3 %), two were labeled "inappropriate," and seven were marked as "uncertain." In the "Surgical strategies for PTH and cranial reconstruction" section, four statements were considered "appropriate" (consensus 74.2−90.4 %), six were "inappropriate," and five were "uncertain." Planning a cranioplasty alongside hydrocephalus remains a significant challenge in neurosurgery. Our consensus conference suggests that, in patients with cranial decompression and suspected hydrocephalus, the most suitable diagnostic approach involves a combination of evolving clinical conditions and neuroradiological imaging. The recommended management sequence prioritizes cranial reconstruction, with the option of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt when needed, preferably with a programmable valve. We strongly recommend to adopt local protocols based on expert consensus, such as this, to guide patient care. •Clinical diagnosis after cranial decompression should rely on evolving symptoms and neuro-psychological tests rather than on a static score.•Radiological diagnosis should be based on the evolving CT and MRI findings, ith flexible use of the Evan's index.•Cranioplasty planning in decompressed patients should adopt a cautious and delayed approach if hydrocephalus diagnosis is required.•To determine the need for a ventriculo peritoneal shunt, it is recommended cranial reconstruction first, and serial clinical and radiological follow-ups then.•When a shunt insertion is necessary, a programmable valve is the preferred choice.