Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 12 von 24

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Prognostic Accuracy of qSOFA and SIRS for Mortality in the Emergency Department: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of Prospective Studies
Ist Teil von
  • Emergency medicine international, 2022-05, Vol.2022, p.1802707-11
Ort / Verlag
Egypt: Hindawi
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Alma/SFX Local Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Objective. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the prognostic performance of quick sequential organ failure assessment (qSOFA) score in comparison to systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in predicting in-hospital mortality in the emergency department (ED) patients. Methods. Eligible studies comparing the performance of qSOFA and SIRS in predicting in-hospital death of ED patients were identified from searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Raw data were collected, and the pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated for qSOFA and SIRS. The summary receiver operating curve was also plotted to calculate the area under the curve. Results. A total of 16 prospective studies with 35,756 patients and 2,285 deaths were included. The pooled sensitivity was 0.43 (95% CI: 0.32–0.54) and 0.8 (95% CI: 0.73–0.86) for qSOFA and SIRS, respectively. The pooled specificity was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.84–0.93) and 0.39 (95% CI: 0.3–0.5) for qSOFA and SIRS, respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating curve was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72–0.8) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.62–0.72) for qSOFA and SIRS, respectively. A significant heterogeneity was observed for both qSOFA and SIRS studies. Conclusion. The present meta-analysis suggested that qSOFA had a higher specificity but a lower sensitivity as compared with SIRS in predicting in-hospital mortality in the ED patients. qSOFA appeared to be a more concise and simple way to recognize patients at high risk for death. However, the use of SIRS in the ED cannot be completely replaced since the sensitivity of qSOFA was relatively lower.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 2090-2840
eISSN: 2090-2859
DOI: 10.1155/2022/1802707
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_4a6f2372f9cd4eadba49d1dc2d5b4a7a

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX