Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Sadler, Diego
• DeCara, Jeanne M.
• Herrmann, Joerg
• Arnold, Anita
• Ghosh, Arjun K.
• Abdel-Qadir, Husam
• Yang, Eric H.
• Szmit, Sebastian
• Akhter, Nausheen
• Leja, Monika
• Silva, Carolina Maria Pinto Domingues Carv
• Raikhelkar, Jayant
• Brown, Sherry-Ann
• Dent, Susan
• O’Quinn, Rupal
• Thuny, Franck
• Moudgil, Rohit
• Raez, Luis E.
• Okwuosa, Tochukwu
• Daniele, Andres
• Bauer, Brenton
• Kondapalli, Lavanya
• Ismail-Khan, Roohi
• Lax, Jorge
• Blaes, Anne
• Nahleh, Zeina
• Elson, Leah
• Baldassarre, Lauren A.
• Zaha, Vlad
• Rao, Vijay
• Lara, Daniel Sierra
• Skurka, Kerry

Titel

Perspectives on the COVID-19 pandemic impact on cardio-oncology: results from the COVID-19 International Collaborative Network survey

Ist Teil von

• Cardio-oncology (London, England), 2020-11, Vol.6 (1), p.1-28, Article 28

Ort / Verlag

London: BioMed Central

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract Background Re-allocation of resources during the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in delays in care delivery to patients with cardiovascular disease and cancer. The ability of health care providers to provide optimal care in this setting has not been formally evaluated. Objectives To assess the impact of COVID-19 resource re-allocation on scheduling, testing, elective procedures, telemedicine access, use of new COVID-19 therapies, and providers’ opinions on healthcare policies among oncology and cardiology practitioners. Methods An electronic survey was conducted by a cardio-oncology collaborative network through regional and state chapters of the American College of Cardiology, American Society of Clinical Oncology, and the International Cardio-Oncology Society. Descriptive statistics were reported by frequency and proportion for analyses, and stratified categorically by geographic region and specialty. Results One thousand four hundred fifteen providers (43 countries) participated: 986 cardiologists, 306 oncologists, and 118 trainees/internal medicine. 63% (195/306) of oncologists vs 92% (896/976) of cardiologists reported cancellations of treatments/elective procedures ( p  = 0.01). 46% (442/970) of cardiologists and 25% (76/303) of oncologists modified the scope of their practice ( p  = < 0.001). Academic physicians (74.5%) felt better supplied with personal protective equipment (PPE) vs non-academic (74.5% vs 67.2%; p  = 0.018). Telemedicine was less common in Europe 81% (74/91), and Latin America 64% (101/158), than the United States, 88% (950/1097) ( p  = < 0.001). 95% of all groups supported more active leadership from medical professional societies. Conclusions These results support initiatives to promote expanded coverage for telemedicine, increased access to PPE, better testing availability and involvement of medical professional societies to help with preparedness for future health care crisis.