Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 1 von 10
BMC health services research, 2022-08, Vol.22 (1), p.1101-1101, Article 1101
2022

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Experience of learning from everyday work in daily safety huddles-a multi-method study
Ist Teil von
  • BMC health services research, 2022-08, Vol.22 (1), p.1101-1101, Article 1101
Ort / Verlag
England: BioMed Central Ltd
Erscheinungsjahr
2022
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
MEDLINE
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • To reduce patient harm, healthcare has focused on improvement based on learning from errors and adverse events (Safety-I). Daily huddles with staff are used to support incident reporting and learning in healthcare. It is proposed that learning for improvement should also be based on situations where work goes well (Safety-II); daily safety huddles should also reflect this approach. A Safety-II-inspired model for safety huddles was developed and implemented at the Neonatal Care Unit at a regional hospital in Sweden. This study followed the implementation with the research questions: Do patient safety huddles with a focus on Safety-II affect the results of measurements of the patient safety culture? What are the experiences of these huddles amongst staff? What experiences of everyday work arise in the patient safety huddles? A multi-method approach was used. The quantitative part consisted of a questionnaire (151 items), submitted on four different occasions, and analysed using Mann Whitney U-test and Kruskal Wallis ANOVA-test. The qualitative data were analysed using thematic content analyses of interviews with staff (n = 14), as well as answers to open questions in the questionnaires. There were 151 individual responses to the questionnaires. The response rates were 44% to 59%. For most comparisons, there were no differences. There were minor changes in patient safety culture measurements. A lower rating was found in December 2020, compared to October 2019 (p < 0.05), regarding whether the employees pointed out when something was about to go wrong. The interviews revealed that, even though most respondents were generally positive towards the huddles (supporting factors), there were problems (hindering factors) in introducing Safety-II concepts in daily safety huddles. There was a challenge to understanding and describing things that go well. For patient safety huddles aimed at exploring everyday work to be experienced as a base for learning, including both negative and positive events (Safety-II); there is a need for an open and permissive climate, that all professions participate and stable conditions in management. Support from managers and knowledge of the underpinning Safety-II theories of those who lead the huddles, may also be of importance.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1472-6963
eISSN: 1472-6963
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08462-9
Titel-ID: cdi_doaj_primary_oai_doaj_org_article_36f7ccdcd2bf4d3cbfc898f9eb10a473

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX