Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Wang, Hao
• Yang, Xueqin
• Zou, Ling
• Huang, Dingming
• Zhou, Xuedong
• Xu, Jialei
• Gao, Yuan

Titel

Shaping outcome of ProTaper NEXT for root canal preparation in mandibular incisors: a micro-CT study

Ist Teil von

• BMC oral health, 2022-07, Vol.22 (1), p.1-302, Article 302

Ort / Verlag

London: BioMed Central Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Quelle

SpringerLink

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract Background Relatively high incidence of single canals with oval or round shape were observed in human mandibular incisors. In order to investigate the influence of the root canal morphology on root canal preparation, the shaping outcome of ProTaper NEXT in oval and round canals of mandibular incisors were evaluated by using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis. Methods This experiment was approved by the School Medical Ethics Committee. The sample size calculation was conducted using G*Power software. Intact mandibular incisors with a single canal were selected. Oval canals (2 < aspect ratio (AR) ≤ 4) and round canals (AR ≤ 2) were pair-matched according to canal length, and assigned to two experimental groups (13 per group). ProTaper NEXT was used for root canal preparation for both groups. Untouched canal wall (UCW), root canal morphological parameters and three-dimensional (3D) dentin thickness were evaluated in the entire root canal and each canal third after micro-CT scanning. Statistical analysis: Data were collected and analyzed with Mann–Whitney test and Friedman test using SPSS statistics software 25 ( P  < 0.05). Additionally, correlations of UCW area with canal morphological parameters were also investigated. Results After root canal preparation, no significant difference was observed in all analyzed parameters in the apical third between oval and round canal groups ( P  > 0.05). In the coronal two thirds of the canal, the post-operative structure model index (SMI), form factor and roundness were significantly increased, while the AR was significantly decreased in both groups ( P  < 0.05). In addition, in the coronal two thirds, significantly more UCW and higher UCWΔ% was observed in oval canal group ( P  < 0.05). Furthermore, UCW correlated very strongly to canal major diameter (0.924) and initial volume (0.938), and strongly to canal form factor (− 0.724), minor diameter (0.799) and canal area (0.882). Proximal dentin wall was associated with significantly thinner pre-operative dentin thickness and higher amount of dentin removal after root canal preparation in both oval and round canal groups. Conclusions (1) Both types of canals were more conical after root canal preparation, but oval root canals tend to leave more UCW area than round canals in the coronal two thirds of mandibular incisors, which contributes to the challenge for endodontic infection control. (2) Root canal preparation usually results in excessive dentin removal in the proximal dentin wall comparing with buccal and lingual walls in both types of canals of mandibular incisors.