Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Foreman, Sarah C
• Llorián-Salvador, Oscar
• David, Diana E
• Rösner, Verena K N
• Rischewski, Jon F
• Feuerriegel, Georg C
• Kramp, Daniel W
• Luiken, Ina
• Lohse, Ann-Kathrin
• Kiefer, Jurij
• Mogler, Carolin
• Knebel, Carolin
• Jung, Matthias
• Andrade-Navarro, Miguel A
• Rost, Burkhard
• Combs, Stephanie E
• Makowski, Marcus R
• Woertler, Klaus
• Peeken, Jan C
• Gersing, Alexandra S

Titel

Development and Evaluation of MR-Based Radiogenomic Models to Differentiate Atypical Lipomatous Tumors from Lipomas

Ist Teil von

• Cancers, 2023-04, Vol.15 (7), p.2150

Ort / Verlag

Switzerland: MDPI AG

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

EZB Free E-Journals

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• The aim of this study was to develop and validate radiogenomic models to predict the MDM2 gene amplification status and differentiate between ALTs and lipomas on preoperative MR images. MR images were obtained in 257 patients diagnosed with ALTs ( = 65) or lipomas ( = 192) using histology and the MDM2 gene analysis as a reference standard. The protocols included T2-, T1-, and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences. Additionally, 50 patients were obtained from a different hospital for external testing. Radiomic features were selected using mRMR. Using repeated nested cross-validation, the machine-learning models were trained on radiomic features and demographic information. For comparison, the external test set was evaluated by three radiology residents and one attending radiologist. A LASSO classifier trained on radiomic features from all sequences performed best, with an AUC of 0.88, 70% sensitivity, 81% specificity, and 76% accuracy. In comparison, the radiology residents achieved 60-70% accuracy, 55-80% sensitivity, and 63-77% specificity, while the attending radiologist achieved 90% accuracy, 96% sensitivity, and 87% specificity. A radiogenomic model combining features from multiple MR sequences showed the best performance in predicting the MDM2 gene amplification status. The model showed a higher accuracy compared to the radiology residents, though lower compared to the attending radiologist.