Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Meehan, Mairi C.
• Singh, Gerald G.
• Ban, Natalie C.
• Devillers, Rodolphe
• Claudet, Joachim

Titel

Striking a balance between ecological, economic, governance, and social dimensions in marine protected area network evaluations

Ist Teil von

• Conservation science and practice, 2023-08, Vol.5 (8), p.n/a

Ort / Verlag

Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

Wiley Online Library Journals

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Marine protected area networks (MPANs) are promised as tools for protecting biodiversity and contributing to sustainable development. The variety of expected social‐ecological outcomes associated with MPANs underscores a need to consider ecological, economic, governance, and social dimensions in MPAN design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation. However, little is known about how these four dimensions are considered or shaped by objectives. We conducted an online survey with MPAN managers, technical staff, and academics from across the globe (77 survey responses that described 48 MPANs located in 59 countries). Our findings confirmed that most MPANs have various co‐occurring, potentially conflicting objectives. MPANs with biodiversity and societal objectives considered attributes (e.g., human well‐being and economic distribution, institutional partnerships, and network‐specific ecological attributes) among all dimensions, with greater frequency than MPANs with only biodiversity objectives. Nonetheless, ecological attributes were always perceived as important irrespective of the MPAN objective. Reaching synergies between the multiple dimensions of MPANs can be challenging if dimensions get overlooked in MPAN evaluations. Identifying the important attributes considered in MPANs offers insight into the practice of MPAN design, implementation, monitoring, and evaluation and can help improve MPAN success. Expert survey shows balanced consideration among multiple dimensions in MPAN evaluations with diverse objectives over those with solely biodiversity objectives.