Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Evaluating Shallow Convection Parameterization Assumptions With a qt–w Quadrant Analysis
Ist Teil von
Journal of advances in modeling earth systems, 2023-08, Vol.15 (8), p.n/a
Ort / Verlag
Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2023
Quelle
Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Uncertainties associated with the response of shallow clouds to global warming remain a great challenge for climate projection. Due to the small size of these clouds, parameterizations are required to represent them in both current‐ and next‐generation climate models. We present a quantitative evaluation of several important assumptions used in both mass‐flux and Assumed‐PDF Higher‐Order Closure parameterizations of shallow convection. We use large‐eddy simulations (LESs) of four different shallow convection regimes as benchmarks and apply a qt (total moisture)–w (vertical velocity) quadrant analysis technique to identify the “coherent structures” of moist and dry up/down‐drafts. The statistics of these coherent structures and the environment are then used to evaluate commonly used assumptions in mass‐flux parameterizations related to (a) the convective downdrafts and (b) the subplume variability of convective updrafts. For quantitative evaluation of the PDF closure used in AP‐HOCs, we perform offline calculations with the PDF closure used in the Cloud Layers Unified By Bi‐normals and the Simplified Higher‐Order Closure schemes by supplying the closure with statistical quantities directly calculated from the LESs. Then, the impact of parameterization assumptions embedded in the PDF closure in the same two categories is analyzed and understood through comparisons of the output from the closure with the statistics of the moist and dry up/down‐drafts from the LESs.
Plain Language Summary
This study examines critically several key simplifying assumptions about convective downdrafts and small‐scale variability associated with shallow clouds that are made in two types of shallow convection parameterizations widely used in numerical weather and climate models and demonstrates quantitatively the impact of these assumptions on the parameterized cloud water content, depth, and turbulent transport.
Key Points
A qt–w quadrant analysis is applied to identify convective coherent structures in large‐eddy simulations of various shallow cloud regimes
Statistics from the quadrant analysis is used to evaluate assumptions in mass‐flux and Assumed‐PDF Higher‐Order Closure shallow convection parameterizations
Simplifying assumptions on convective downdrafts and subplume variability are linked to parameterization deficiencies