Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Tseng, L Olivia
• Newton, Christie
• Hall, David
• Lee, Esther J
• Chang, Howard
• Poureslami, Iraj
• Vasarhelyi, Krisztina
• Lacaille, Diane
• Mitton, Craig

Titel

Primary care family physicians’ experiences with clinical integration in qualitative and mixed reviews: a systematic review protocol

Ist Teil von

• BMJ open, 2023-07, Vol.13 (7), p.e067576-e067576

Ort / Verlag

England: British Medical Journal Publishing Group

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• IntroductionClinical (service) integration in primary care settings describes how comprehensive care is coordinated by family physicians (FPs) over time across healthcare contexts to meet patient care needs. To improve care integration and healthcare service planning, a systematic approach to understanding its numerous influencing factors is paramount. The objective of this study is to generate a comprehensive map of FP-perceived factors influencing clinical integration across diseases and patient demographics.Methods and analysisWe developed the protocol with the guidance of the Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review methodology framework. An information specialist built search strategies for MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases using keywords and MeSH terms iteratively collected from a multidisciplinary team. Two reviewers will work independently throughout the study process, from article selection to data analysis. The identified records will be screened by title and abstract and reviewed in the full text against the criteria: FP in primary care (population), clinical integration (concept) and qualitative and mixed reviews published in 2011–2021 (context). We will first describe the characteristics of the review studies. Then, we will extract qualitative, FP-perceived factors and group them by content similarities, such as patient factors. Lastly, we will describe the types of extracted factors using a custom framework.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval is not required for a systematic review. The identified factors will help generate an item bank for a survey that will be developed in the Phase II study to ascertain high-impact factors for intervention(s), as well as evidence gaps to guide future research. We will share the study findings with various knowledge users to promote awareness of clinical integration issues through multiple channels: publications and conferences for researchers and care providers, an executive summary for clinical leaders and policy-makers, and social media for the public.