Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Kadota, Jillian L
• Musinguzi, Allan
• Nabunje, Juliet
• Welishe, Fred
• Ssemata, Jackie L
• Bishop, Opira
• Berger, Christopher A
• Patel, Devika
• Sammann, Amanda
• Katahoire, Anne
• Nahid, Payam
• Belknap, Robert
• Phillips, Patrick P J
• Namusobya, Jennifer
• Kamya, Moses
• Handley, Margaret A
• Kiwanuka, Noah
• Katamba, Achilles
• Dowdy, David
• Semitala, Fred C
• Cattamanchi, Adithya

Titel

Protocol for the 3HP Options Trial: a hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness randomized trial of delivery strategies for short-course tuberculosis preventive therapy among people living with HIV in Uganda

Ist Teil von

• Implementation science : IS, 2020-08, Vol.15 (1), p.65-12, Article 65

Ort / Verlag

England: BioMed Central Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

SpringerLink (Online service)

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Recently, a 3-month (12-dose) regimen of weekly isoniazid and rifapentine (3HP) was recommended by the World Health Organization for the prevention of tuberculosis (TB) among people living with HIV (PLHIV) on common antiretroviral therapy regimens. The best approach to delivering 3HP to PLHIV remains uncertain. We developed a three-armed randomized trial assessing optimized strategies for delivering 3HP to PLHIV. The trial will be conducted at the Mulago Immune Suppression Syndrome (i.e., HIV/AIDS) clinic in Kampala, Uganda. We plan to recruit 1656 PLHIV, randomized 1:1 to each of the three arms (552 per arm). Using a hybrid type 3 effectiveness-implementation design, this pragmatic trial aims to (1) compare the acceptance and completion of 3HP among PLHIV under three delivery strategies: directly observed therapy (DOT), self-administered therapy (SAT), and informed patient choice of either DOT or SAT (with the assistance of a decision aid); (2) to identify processes and contextual factors that influence the acceptance and completion of 3HP under each delivery strategy; and (3) to estimate the costs and compare the cost-effectiveness of three strategies for delivering 3HP. The three delivery strategies were each optimized to address key barriers to 3HP completion using a theory-informed approach. We hypothesize that high levels of treatment acceptance and completion can be achieved among PLHIV in sub-Saharan Africa and that offering PLHIV an informed choice between the optimized DOT and SAT delivery strategies will result in greater acceptance and completion of 3HP. The design and planned evaluation of the delivery strategies were guided by the use of implementation science conceptual frameworks. 3HP-one of the most promising interventions for TB prevention-will not be scaled up unless it can be delivered in a patient-centered fashion. We highlight shared decision-making as a key element of our trial design and theorize that offering PLHIV an informed choice between optimized delivery strategies will facilitate the highest levels of treatment acceptance and completion. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03934931 ; Registered 2 May 2019.