Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Nielsen, Søren Saxmose
• Alvarez, Julio
• Calistri, Paolo
• Canali, Elisabetta
• Drewe, Julian Ashley
• Garin‐Bastuji, Bruno
• Gonzales Rojas, José Luis
• Gortázar, Christian
• Herskin, Mette S
• Michel, Virginie
• Miranda Chueca, Miguel Ángel
• Padalino, Barbara
• Roberts, Helen Clare
• Spoolder, Hans
• Ståhl, Karl
• Velarde, Antonio
• Viltrop, Arvo
• Winckler, Christoph
• Bron, James
• Olesen, Niels Jorgen
• Sindre, Hilde
• Stone, David
• Vendramin, Niccolò
• Antoniou, Sotiria Eleni
• Karagianni, Anna Eleonora
• Kohnle, Lisa
• Papanikolaou, Alexandra
• Bicout, Dominique Joseph

Titel

Assessment of listing and categorisation of animal diseases within the framework of the Animal Health Law (Regulation (EU) 2016/429): infection with Gyrodactylus salaris (GS)

Ist Teil von

• EFSA journal, 2023-10, Vol.21 (10), p.e08325-n/a

Ort / Verlag

Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Infection with Gyrodactylus salaris was assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular, the criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as laid down in Article 9 and Article 8 for listing animal species related to infection with G. salaris. The assessment was performed following the ad hoc method for data collection and assessment previously developed by AHAW panel and already published. The outcome reported is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with an uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether infection with G. salaris can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (33–70% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that Infection with G. salaris does not meet the criteria in Section 1 and 3 (Category A and C; 1–5% and 10–33% probability of fulfilling the criteria, respectively) and it is uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 2, 4 and 5 (Categories B, D and E; 33–80%, 33–66% and 33–80% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The animal species to be listed for infection with G. salaris according to Article 8 criteria are provided. This publication is linked to the following EFSA Journal articles: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8324/full, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8326/full, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8327/full, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.4783full, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2023.8028/full