Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Dwivedi, D.
• Santos, A. L. D.
• Barnard, M. A.
• Crimmins, T. M.
• Malhotra, A.
• Rod, K. A.
• Aho, K. S.
• Bell, S. M.
• Bomfim, B.
• Brearley, F. Q.
• Cadillo‐Quiroz, H.
• Chen, J.
• Gough, C. M.
• Graham, E. B.
• Hakkenberg, C. R.
• Haygood, L.
• Koren, G.
• Lilleskov, E. A.
• Meredith, L. K.
• Naeher, S.
• Nickerson, Z. L.
• Pourret, O.
• Song, H.‐S.
• Stahl, M.
• Taş, N.
• Vargas, R.
• Weintraub‐Leff, S.

Titel

Biogeosciences Perspectives on Integrated, Coordinated, Open, Networked (ICON) Science

Ist Teil von

• Earth and space science (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022-03, Vol.9 (3), p.e2021EA002119-n/a

Ort / Verlag

Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc

Erscheinungsjahr

2022

Quelle

Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• This article is composed of three independent commentaries about the state of Integrated, Coordinated, Open, Networked (ICON) principles in the American Geophysical Union Biogeosciences section, and discussion on the opportunities and challenges of adopting them. Each commentary focuses on a different topic: (a) Global collaboration, technology transfer, and application (Section 2), (b) Community engagement, community science, education, and stakeholder involvement (Section 3), and (c) Field, experimental, remote sensing, and real‐time data research and application (Section 4). We discuss needs and strategies for implementing ICON and outline short‐ and long‐term goals. The inclusion of global data and international community engagement are key to tackling grand challenges in biogeosciences. Although recent technological advances and growing open‐access information across the world have enabled global collaborations to some extent, several barriers, ranging from technical to organizational to cultural, have remained in advancing interoperability and tangible scientific progress in biogeosciences. Overcoming these hurdles is necessary to address pressing large‐scale research questions and applications in the biogeosciences, where ICON principles are essential. Here, we list several opportunities for ICON, including coordinated experimentation and field observations across global sites, that are ripe for implementation in biogeosciences as a means to scientific advancements and social progress. Plain Language Summary Biogeosciences is an interdisciplinary field that requires multiscale global data and concerted international community efforts to tackle grand challenges. However, several technical, institutional, and cultural hurdles have remained as major roadblocks toward scientific progress, hindering seamless global data acquisition and international community engagement. To bring a paradigm shift in biogeosciences, there is a need to implement integrated, coordinated, open, and networked efforts, collectively known as the Integrated, Coordinated, Open, Networked (ICON) principles. In this article, we present three related commentaries about the state of ICON, discuss needs to reduce geographical bias in data for enhancing scientific progress, and identify action items. Action items are primarily people‐centric and include but are not limited to: longer‐term funding priorities to institutionalize capacity and reduce entry costs, engagement of local stakeholders across the globe, incentivization of collaborations, and development of training and workshops for capacity building. Key Points Biogeosciences needs Integrated, Coordinated, Open, Networked (ICON) principles to address multiscale global problems and reduce geographical bias in scientific progress Much potential exists for emphasizing people‐centric capacity building, involving relevant stakeholders within an ICON framework Globally coordinated experimental and field data provide challenges and opportunities for scientific advancement in biogeosciences