Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 4 von 280
Applied Animal Science, 2024-04, Vol.40 (2), p.91-102
2024
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Evaluating supplementation programs for growing calves grazing bermudagrass pastures
Ist Teil von
  • Applied Animal Science, 2024-04, Vol.40 (2), p.91-102
Ort / Verlag
Elsevier Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2024
Quelle
Alma/SFX Local Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Our objective was to determine gain in response to hand-fed (HF) or self-fed (SF) summer supplementation programs at the University of Arkansas Livestock and Forestry Research Station, on twenty 0.81-ha common bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon [L.] Pers.) pastures at a stocking rate of 6.17 calves/ha (BW ± SD = 247 ± 24.6) over 3 yr. This experiment was designed in a 2 × 2 + 1 factorial arrangement of treatments including control (CON), with only free-choice mineral; HF, 1.13 kg/d byproduct-based supplement offered only late summer (LS) or all summer (AS); or SF tub supplement (PVM Cattle Tub, Positive Feed Ltd., Sealy, TX) either LS or AS. The HF supplement in yr 1 was a 50:50 blend of soybean hulls and corn gluten feed, in yr 2 an extruded dried distillers grains cube (MasterHand Milling, Lexington, NE) was used, and in yr 3 corn gluten feed was the HF supplement. Data were analyzed as a generalized randomized complete block design using the mixed procedure of SAS (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). Fixed effects in the model included supplementation treatment, year, and year × treatment interaction. Even though different HF supplements were used each year, there were no year × treatment interactions. Early summer ADG was greater for HFAS than CON and SFAS, whereas supplemental efficiency (kg added gain/kg supplement) in early summer was less for SFAS than HFAS. Late summer ADG was greater for HF treatments than SF treatments and CON, whereas SF did not differ among supplement treatments. Cost of added gain was $28.33 and $16.14/kg for SFAS and SFLS, respectively, compared with $3.32 and $1.68/ kg for HFAS and HFLS, respectively. Calves on this experiment did not respond as expected to the SF supplement, likely because the bermudagrass pastures in this experiment averaged over 13% CP and were in excess of 10% even in the LS sampling periods. Depending on supplement delivery costs, the most cost-effective way to add gain with supplement to growing calves grazing bermudagrass pasture is by HF.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 2590-2865
eISSN: 2590-2865
DOI: 10.15232/aas.2023-02494
Titel-ID: cdi_crossref_primary_10_15232_aas_2023_02494

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX