Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
A multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) of adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) with residual plasma EBV DNA (EBV DNA) following primary radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT)
Ist Teil von
Journal of clinical oncology, 2012-05, Vol.30 (15_suppl), p.5511-5511
Erscheinungsjahr
2012
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Abstract only
5511
Background: The benefit of adjuvant CT in NPC is unclear. Administering CT after full-dose CRT presents challenges in treatment compliance and toxicity. Post-RT EBV DNA predicts poor survival and may be a biomarker of subclinical residual disease. We conducted a biomarker driven RCT using EBV DNA to select high risk NPC patients (pts) for adjuvant CT while sparing low risk pts from unnecessary toxicity. Methods: Biopsy proven NPC, AJCC stage IIB-IVB, detectable EBV DNA at 6-8 wks post-RT, no persistent locoregional disease or distant metastasis, ECOG 0 or 1, adequate organ function. Randomised with stratification for primary therapy (RT Vs CRT) and tumor stage (II/III Vs IV) to arm A (adjuvant cisplatin 40 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 1000mg/m2, both given on D1+8 q3w x 6 cycles) or arm B (clinical follow-up). EBV DNA and PET scan were performed before and 6 months after randomization. Primary endpoint was relapse free survival and secondary endpoints included toxicity of adjuvant CT. With a hazard ratio of 2, 100 pts were required with a power of 0.8 and an alpha at 0.05. This safety analysis was approved by DMSC. Results: From 9/2006 to 12/2011, 514 pts consented for EBV DNA screening, 95 with detectable EBV DNA consented for adjuvant study. After work-up, 74 were eligible for randomization (37 to arm A; 37 to arm B). The two arms were well balanced in baseline characteristics. 80% received prior neoadjuvant and/or concurrent CT. Staging: IIB (36.5%), III (29.7%), IVA (18.9%), IVB (14.8%). Five pts refused adjuvant CT after randomization. Overall 65% and 57% completed 5 and 6 cycles respectively. Mean dose intensity (DI): 84% for cisplatin (22.5 mg/m2/wk, range 0.0-26.7), 92% for gemcitabine (612.8 mg/m2/wk, range 333.3-777.8). Treatment related adverse events above CTC G2 were summarized in Table. Conclusions: Delivery of 6 cycles of adjuvant CT is feasible with acceptable toxicity after full dose RT or CRT. [Table: see text]