Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Is third-line chemotherapy routine practice in recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer?
Ist Teil von
Journal of clinical oncology, 2017-05, Vol.35 (15_suppl), p.e15558-e15558
Erscheinungsjahr
2017
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）
Beschreibungen/Notizen
Abstract only
e15558
Background: Patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer eventually experience disease progression during or after completion of first-line chemotherapy. Second-line therapy is generally recommended in the current guidelines. Although third-line therapy is often performed in daily practice in some countries, there are few reports about the benefit of third-line therapy. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 683 pts who underwent at least first-line palliative chemotherapy for recurrent (n = 297) or primary metastatic (n = 386) gastric cancer. Clinicopathological characteristics and overall survival (OS) were analyzed according to the lines of chemotherapy as well as for all study pts. Results: One hundred and forty-nine pts (21.8%) underwent third- or further-line therapy. Third- or further-line therapy was more frequently performed in pts with young age ( < 70) (p < 0.0001), ECOG PS 0 or 1 (p < 0.0001) at the initiation of first-line therapy, first-line combination regimen (p = 0.006), and palliative surgical resection before first-line therapy (p = 0.029). The median follow-up duration was 62 months (24-151 months) for the survivors. The median OS for pts after first- and third-line therapy was 10 and 6 months, respectively. The median OS of pts who received third-line therapy was significantly longer than that of pts who received second- or lesser-line therapy (18 vs. 8 months, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that third- or further-line therapy was independently associated with favorable OS (hazard ratio = 0.56, p < 0.0001) along with surgical resection (p < 0.0001) and first-line combination regimen (p = 0.008), whereas signet ring cell histology (p = 0.002) and peritoneal metastasis (p = 0.027) were independent prognostic factors of poor OS. Conclusions: This study suggests that recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer pts may benefit from third-line chemotherapy, although careful selection is essential.