Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 14 von 62

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Diagnosis of functional constipation: Agreement between R ome III and R ome II criteria and evaluation for the practicality
Ist Teil von
  • Journal of digestive diseases, 2014-06, Vol.15 (6), p.314-320
Erscheinungsjahr
2014
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Objective To investigate the agreement between R ome III and R ome II criteria for diagnosing functional constipation ( FC ) and to evaluate the accuracy of each constipation symptom for FC diagnosis. Methods Patients with chronic constipation underwent rigorous biochemical and endoscopic/imaging tests to exclude organic and metabolic diseases. The questionnaires including general information, constipation symptoms, and the most troublesome constipation symptoms were completed in a face‐to‐face survey. The accuracy of constipation symptoms for FC diagnosis was examined using the likelihood ratio. Results Among 184 patients (43 males and 141 females) with chronic constipation, 166 (90.2%) met R ome II criteria and 174 (94.6%) met R ome III criteria for FC, while 166 met both criteria. There was a good diagnostic agreement between the two sets of criteria, with a kappa value of 0.69 and the overall agreement rate was 95.7% ( P < 0.001). Based on R ome III criteria, the most accurate symptom for FC diagnosis was sensation of anorectal blockage, followed by straining during defecation and infrequent bowel movements. The most troublesome symptoms reported by patients were lumpy or hard stools, straining during defecation, sensation of incomplete evacuation. More patients indicated that ‘the symptoms in the past 3 months’ was better than ‘those within the past one year’ to reflect their constipation (36.7% vs 6.0%, P < 0.001). Conclusions There is good agreement between R ome III and R ome II criteria for FC diagnosis. R ome III criteria are more practical than R ome II criteria for C hinese patients.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1751-2972
eISSN: 1751-2980
DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12145
Titel-ID: cdi_crossref_primary_10_1111_1751_2980_12145
Format

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX