Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 12 von 348
Global studies quarterly, 2023-10, Vol.3 (4)
2023
Volltextzugriff (PDF)

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Knock It Down? Unmaking, Deconstruction, and Destruction as/in Politics Research
Ist Teil von
  • Global studies quarterly, 2023-10, Vol.3 (4)
Ort / Verlag
Oxford University Press
Erscheinungsjahr
2023
Quelle
EZB Electronic Journals Library
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Abstract Unmaking, deconstruction, and destruction are part of the everyday life of politics. This article makes an initial case for the plausibility of the argument that International Relations (IR) should expand its gaze and scholarly practice not only into material-aesthetic making, as suggested by the International Political Design (IPD) project, but also into material-aesthetic unmaking and destruction. If making is thinking, as Austin and Leander (2021) suggest, unmaking is also a scholarly enterprise, one that might be as intellectually significant as making, and have important implications for the project specifically and IR scholarship more generally. While I am not arguing that unmaking or destruction is always or even usually normatively good, I am arguing that it is intellectually important to understand and engage, and that thinking about unmaking has important normative implications for making. The first section of this article introduces the IPD project, and suggests that it is operationally and necessarily positive in its current instantiations, despite its criticality. The second section, drawing on inspirations as divergent as queer theory and realist IR, sets out an onto-epistemologically negative approach to IR/the world and uses that approach to problematize the positivity of the IPD project. The following three sections engage with potential negative approaches to making-as-scholarship: negative design, deconstruction, and destruction, engaging with the potential implications for both disciplinary inquiry in IR and the practices of IR scholars in the “world” as such. A conclusion talks about the importance of including deconstruction, demolition, destruction, tearing down, and unmaking in IR scholarship.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 2634-3797
eISSN: 2634-3797
DOI: 10.1093/isagsq/ksad066
Titel-ID: cdi_crossref_primary_10_1093_isagsq_ksad066
Format

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX