Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Minatoguchi, S
• Tanaka, R
• Yoshizane, T
• Deguchi, T
• Sato, H
• Ono, K
• Nagaya, M
• Miwa, H
• Iwama, M
• Noda, T
• Watanabe, S
• Kawasaki, M
• Okura, H

Titel

P3548Noninvasive estimation of left ventricular diastolic function in patients with hypertension and normal ejection fraction using 3-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography

Ist Teil von

• European heart journal, 2019-10, Vol.40 (Supplement_1)

Ort / Verlag

Oxford University Press

Erscheinungsjahr

2019

Link zum Volltext

Quelle

Oxford Journals 2020 Medicine

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract Background Left ventricular (LV) relaxation (eTau) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (ePCWP) were reported to be estimated by speckle tracking echocardiography (STE). LV camber stiffness (e-c stiffness) may be estimated with the use of 2 diastolic pressure-volume coordinates. The minimum diastolic pressure (mP) is reported to have a strong correlation with Tau. Purpose We sought to examine the impact of hypertension on LV diastolic function and LA properties and to elucidate the feature of hypertensive heart failure with preserved EF (HFpEF). Methods The e', E/e', Tau, PCWP, LVEDP, LV stiffness, LAV, LA emptying function (LAEF) and LA strain were examined in 53 controls (age 66±11), 136 hypertensive patients (HTN) with normal EF (69±11) and 39 HFpEF (77±14). ePCWP and estimated EDP (eEDP) was calculated as previously reported. Tau was calculated as isovolumic relaxation time/(ln 0.9 x systolic blood pressure − ln PCWP). Myocardial stiffness (e-m stiffness) was estimated as LVED stress/LV strain. LV c-stiffness was calculated as LV pressure change (from mP to EDP) obtained by catheterization divided by LV volume change. Estimated LV c-stiffness (e-c-stiffness) was noninvasively obtained using e-mP and e-EDP. The eTau, eEDP and e-mP by STE were validated by catheterization (n=126). Results The mP had a good correlation with Tau (r=0.70, p<0.01). The eTau, eEDP and e-mP by STE had a good correlation with those by catheterization (r=0.75, 0.63 and 0.70, p<0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that ePCWP and LA strain were independent predictors of HFpEF. LV diastoric function Variables Control HTN HFpEF LVEF, % 68±6 68±8 63±9*+ LV longitudinal strain x (s–1) 19.1±3.0 16.8±4.3* 14.5±5.1*+ E/e' 9.2±2.6 11.6±4.5* 15.9±7.9*+ eTau, ms 35±12 48±17* 59±17*+ ePCWP, mmHg 7.3±2.7 8.3±4.3 15.0±4.4*+ eLVEDP, mmHg 9.4±2.2 10.4±3.5 15.9±3.7*+ LV e-myocardial stiffness, kdynes/cm 0.56±0.25 0.69±0.56 1.27±0.71*+ LV e-chamber stiffness, mmHg/ml 0.19±0.06 0.20±0.08 0.36±0.19*+ Maximum LAVI, ml/m2 42±15 50±21* 68±17*+ Total LAEF, % 55±7 51±11 36±12*+ LA peak strain 41±15 40±17 19±8*+ *p<0.05 vs Control, +p<0.05 vs HTN. Conclusion We demonstrated that LV diastolic function in HTN may be accurately and noninvasively evaluated by STE.