Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Boeddinghaus, J
• Sanzone, A
• Lopez-Ayala, P
• Koechlin, L
• Nestelberger, T
• Rubini Gimenez, M
• Wildi, K
• Keller, D
• Miro, O
• Christ, M
• Mueller, C

Titel

Prevalence and outcome of clinical misdiagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Ist Teil von

• European heart journal, 2023-11, Vol.44 (Supplement_2)

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Quelle

Oxford Journals 2020 Medicine

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Abstract Background The prevalence of clinical misdiagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and its impact on patient outcomes is largely unknown. Methods We prospectively enrolled adult patients presenting with suspected acute coronary syndromes at 12 sites in five European countries. All patients provided written informed consent and were managed as per local clinical care using conventional, sensitive or high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays. Study blood samples were taken at presentation and serially thereafter for measurements of hs-cTn concentrations. Final diagnoses were adjudicated by two independent cardiologists according to current guidelines and the 4th universal definition of myocardial infarction using all information including serial hs-cTnT measurements and imaging. The primary diagnostic endpoint was the prevalence of clinical NSTEMI misdiagnosis. Co-primary prognostic endpoints were 30 day and two year all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) death. Results In 7,678 patients (median age 61 [IQR 48-73], 34% women), the prevalence of adjudicated and clinical NSTEMI was 17.8% and 12.3%, respectively (P<0.001). Among 1,363 patients with an adjudicated NSTEMI (77% type 1 MI, 23% type 2 MI), 470/1,363 (34%) had a clinical NSTEMI misdiagnosis. These patients were older, more often female, had lower median cTn concentrations, and were more likely managed at centers using non-hs-cTn assays at time of enrolment. Compared to patients with an adjudicated and clinical NSTEMI diagnosis, missed patients were less likely to undergo coronary angiography or revascularization and less often discharged on evidence-based treatment (dual antiplatelet therapy 24% vs 79%, statin 64% vs 92%, betablocker 68% vs 81%, all P<0.001). Finally, patients with a clinical NSTEMI misdiagnosis were at much higher risk of premature all-cause (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.18-1.94, P<0.001) and CV (HR 1.93, 95%CI 1.42-2.63, P<0.001) death. Conclusion One out of three adjudicated NSTEMI patients was misdiagnosed in routine clinical care. Clinical NSTEMI misdiagnosis was associated with lower use of guideline-recommended therapies and a substantial increase in premature death.Alluvial plotAll-cause death at 2-years