Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• McMahon, Caitlin E.
• Foti, Nicole
• Jeske, Melanie
• Britton, William R.
• Fullerton, Stephanie M.
• Shim, Janet K.
• Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin

Titel

Interrogating the Value of Return of Results for Diverse Populations: Perspectives from Precision Medicine Researchers

Ist Teil von

• AJOB empirical bioethics, 2024-04, Vol.15 (2), p.108-119

Ort / Verlag

United States: Taylor & Francis

Erscheinungsjahr

2024

Quelle

MEDLINE

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• Over the last decade, the return of results (ROR) in precision medicine research (PMR) has become increasingly routine. Calls for individual rights to research results have extended the "duty to report" from clinically useful genetic information to traits and ancestry results. ROR has thus been reframed as inherently beneficial to research participants, without a needed focus on who benefits and how. This paper addresses this gap, particularly in the context of PMR aimed at increasing participant diversity, by providing investigator and researcher perspectives on and questions about the assumed value of ROR in PMR. Semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of investigators and researchers across federally funded PMR studies in three national consortia, as well as observations of study activities, focused on how PM researchers conceptualize diversity and implement inclusive practices across research stages, including navigating ROR. Interviewees (1) validated the value of ROR as a benefit of PMR, while others (2) questioned the benefit of clinically actionable results to individuals in the absence of sufficient resources for translating findings into health care for diverse and disadvantaged populations; (3) expressed uncertainties in applying the presumed value of ROR as a benefit for non-clinical results; and (4) and debated when the promise of the value of ROR may undermine trust in PMR, and divert efforts to return value beyond ROR. Conceptualizations of diversity and inclusion among PM researchers and investigators raise unique ethical questions where unexamined assumptions of the value of ROR inform study recruitment efforts to enroll minoritized and under-represented populations. A lack of consideration for resources and infrastructure necessary to translate ROR into actionable information may hinder trustworthy community-research relationships. Thus, we argue for a more intentional interrogation of ROR practices as an offer of benefit and for whom.