Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Factors Contributing to the Delayed Submission of Competence to Stand Trial Reports and the Jail-Based Competency Crisis in Washington
Ist Teil von
  • Psychology, public policy, and law, 2023-11, Vol.30 (2), p.149-158
Ort / Verlag
American Psychological Association
Erscheinungsjahr
2023
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • In recent years, demand has outpaced capacity to provide timely competence to stand trial (CST) evaluations and subsequent restoration services. This outpacing of resources has been coined the "competency crisis" and led to class action lawsuits across the country aimed at improving the timeliness of jail-based competence evaluations and inpatient restoration services. This study examined rates of CST evaluation delays in Washington State and evaluator-cited barriers to timely report submission for jail-based CST evaluations. The study used data from N = 17,874 court-ordered jail-based CST evaluations and N = 1,739 Good Cause Exception (e.g., extension) requests submitted by forensic evaluators to local courts from June 2018 to November 2022. Results indicated the number of jail-based CST evaluations increased annually, as did the percentage of evaluations with an accompanying extension request. Although Washington evaluators could have asked for a Good Cause Exception in any case that appeared to be at risk for noncompliance, they did not always do so, with only one request submitted for every 2.36 noncompliant evaluations. When evaluators did submit an extension request, the most common reason cited for requesting extensions was "attorney" (42.5%) followed by "other" (34.2%) and "more information needed" (17.1%). Although the most frequently cited reason for delays may be unique to Washington (i.e., attorney presence for evaluations), it highlights the importance of jurisdiction-specific field studies to identify and reduce barriers to the timely completion of competence valuations.
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 1076-8971
eISSN: 1939-1528
DOI: 10.1037/law0000408
Titel-ID: cdi_crossref_primary_10_1037_law0000408

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX