Sie befinden Sich nicht im Netzwerk der Universität Paderborn. Der Zugriff auf elektronische Ressourcen ist gegebenenfalls nur via VPN oder Shibboleth (DFN-AAI) möglich. mehr Informationen...
Ergebnis 18 von 32

Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte
Titel
Evaluating chemical similarity as a measure to identify potential substances of very high concern
Ist Teil von
  • Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 2021-02, Vol.119, p.104834, Article 104834
Ort / Verlag
Netherlands: Elsevier Inc
Erscheinungsjahr
2021
Link zum Volltext
Quelle
Alma/SFX Local Collection
Beschreibungen/Notizen
  • Due to the large amount of chemical substances on the market, fast and reproducible screening is essential to prioritize chemicals for further evaluation according to highest concern. We here evaluate the performance of structural similarity models that are developed to identify potential substances of very high concern (SVHC) based on structural similarity to known SVHCs. These models were developed following a systematic analysis of the performance of 112 different similarity measures for varying SVHC-subgroups. The final models consist of the best combinations of fingerprint, similarity coefficient and similarity threshold, and suggested a high predictive performance (≥80%) on an internal dataset consisting of SVHC and non-SVHC substances. However, the application performance on an external dataset was not evaluated. Here, we evaluated the application performance of the developed similarity models with a ‘pseudo-external assessment’ on a set of substances (n = 60–100 for the varying SVHC-subgroups) that were putatively assessed as SVHC or non-SVHC based upon consensus scoring using expert elicitations (n = 30 experts). Expert scores were direct evaluations based on structural similarity to the most similar SVHCs according to the similarity models, and did not consider an extensive evaluation of available data. The use of expert opinions is particularly suitable as this is exactly the intended purpose of the chemical similarity models: a quick, reproducible and automated screening tool that mimics the expert judgement that is frequently applied in various screening applications. In addition, model predictions were analyzed via qualitative approaches and discussed via specific examples, to identify the model's strengths and limitations. The results indicate a good statistical performance for carcinogenic, mutagenic or reprotoxic (CMR) and endocrine disrupting (ED) substances, whereas a moderate performance was observed for (very) persistent, (very) bioaccumulative and toxic (PBT/vPvB) substances when compared to expert opinions. For the PBT/vPvB model, particularly false positive substances were identified, indicating the necessity of outcome interpretation. The developed similarity models are made available as a freely-accessible online tool. In general, the structural similarity models showed great potential for screening and prioritization purposes. The models proved to be effective in identifying groups of substances of potential concern, and could be used to identify follow-up directions for substances of potential concern. [Display omitted] •The performance of new similarity models was evaluated by expert elicitation.•A high predictive performance was observed for CMR and ED chemicals (balanced accuracy ≥80%).•The application performance of the PBT/vPvB model indicates the need of outcome interpretation.•These effective screening models could contribute to the transition to group evaluations.•Freely accessible web-based tool at https://rvszoeksysteem.rivm.nl/ZzsSimilarityTool
Sprache
Englisch
Identifikatoren
ISSN: 0273-2300
eISSN: 1096-0295
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2020.104834
Titel-ID: cdi_crossref_primary_10_1016_j_yrtph_2020_104834

Weiterführende Literatur

Empfehlungen zum selben Thema automatisch vorgeschlagen von bX