Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Zhan, Xiaohong
• Sun, Daner
• Song, Rui
• Yang, Yuqin
• Zhan, Ying

Titel

Empowering students'engineering thinking: An empirical study of integrating engineering into science class at junior secondary schools

Ist Teil von

• Thinking skills and creativity, 2023-09, Vol.49, p.101364, Article 101364

Ort / Verlag

Elsevier Ltd

Erscheinungsjahr

2023

Quelle

Alma/SFX Local Collection

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• •It is a study focusing on exploring the impacts of an Engineering Integrated Science (EIS) curriculum on the development of students’ engineering thinking.•The students from experimental groups and control groups’ engineering thinking were compared by exposing the development of systems thinking, critical thinking, and creative thinking.•The results revealed that the EIS curriculum brought about significant differences in engineering thinking.•Students with different academic achievement levels performed differently in engineering thinking.•Male and female students demonstrated similar levels of engineering thinking, with males showing better performance in creative thinking. With the prosperity of STEM education, engineering thinking has emerged as a crucial component of engineering education. However, current STEM educational practices do not totally promote engineering thinking among students at junior secondary schools. This paper presents a study that investigates the effects of teaching innovation, specifically the Engineering Integrated Science (EIS) curriculum, which integrates engineering design into science classes. The study aims to explore the impact of this curriculum on the development of junior secondary school students' engineering thinking skills, including systems thinking, critical thinking, and creative thinking. This study employed a quasi-experimental design with 286 junior secondary school students, split equally between experimental and control groups, to investigate the impact of integrating engineering design into science classes on students' engineering thinking. Mixed methods, including pre-posttests and interviews, were used to collect data and evaluate the effectiveness of the EIS curriculum, while also exploring influential factors such as academic achievement levels and gender. The results revealed that the EIS curriculum brought about significant differences in engineering thinking between the experimental group and the control group; the experimental group performed better in the development of systems thinking, critical thinking and creative thinking. Further findings suggested students’ achievement levels and gender difference affected their performance in engineering thinking, for example, students with low achievement levels were comparatively weak at creative thinking; male and female students demonstrated similar levels of engineering thinking, with males showing better performance in creative thinking. This study employed mixed research methods to analyze and compare the development of students' engineering thinking before and after the implementation of a self-developed EIS curriculum. Overall, the results showed that the implementation of the EIS curriculum could improve students’ engineering thinking significantly, and expose the impact of this curriculum on students’ systems thinking, critical thinking, and creative thinking. The findings will contribute to the research of thinking skills in engineering-oriented STEM education and inform the design and implementation of engineering-oriented STEM education.