Details

Autor(en) / Beteiligte

• Komossa, Franziska
• Wartmann, Flurina M.
• Kienast, Felix
• Verburg, Peter H.

Titel

Comparing outdoor recreation preferences in peri-urban landscapes using different data gathering methods

Ist Teil von

• Landscape and urban planning, 2020-07, Vol.199, p.103796, Article 103796

Ort / Verlag

Elsevier B.V

Erscheinungsjahr

2020

Quelle

Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)

Beschreibungen/Notizen

• •We apply diverse data gathering methods for outdoor recreation in two study settings.•We compare landscape and spatial preferences across methods and study settings.•Both direct and indirect engagement methods agree on landscape preferences.•Two methods captured attributes related to social/cultural landscape appreciation.•Combining methods yields more holistic insights for i.a. landscape management. The growing demand for a variety of outdoor recreation pursuits in peri-urban areas evokes the need for effective landscape management strategies based on reliable information about recreationists, their preferences and use of the landscape. Although a variety of methods are available for gathering this information, there is a lack of understanding if and how results from these methods are comparable. In this study we apply both direct engagement methods in the form of interviews (incl. participatory mapping, free-listing and quantitative photo ranking) and indirect engagement methods by analysing social media content (location, tags and photo content). The goal was to gather and compare data on outdoor recreation preferences in two study areas, one in the Netherlands and one in Switzerland. We found similar landscape preferences among study areas through both types of engagement methods. Our results indicate that these methods in general consistently identify similar landscape preferences. However, we also found differences regarding the type of information they manage to capture. For instance, for gathering landscape preferences, we found that free-listing and social media user tags, captured attributes related to the social and cultural appreciation of landscapes, including sensory qualities of a landscape and sense of place. The results highlight the potential of complementary approaches for capturing heterogeneous information needed for outdoor recreation research and, more generally, for landscape monitoring and management. Combining multiple methods enables relatively robust findings to be identified, but also addresses different aspects of landscape appreciation from different user groups.